Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

5.115.11
VS
Lidl in GermanyLidl in Germany
5.11

5.11

3150 Bristol, 3rd Floor, Costa Mesa, California, US, 92626

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.511tactical.com
727/1000Moderate

At 5.11, we’re a community and a way of life. From our U.S. stores to our offices worldwide, we design purpose-built gear and apparel that empowers adventurers, everyday heroes, and professionals alike to push boundaries and reach new heights. Our mission is clear: to ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:1,839
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Lidl in Germany

Lidl in Germany

Bonfelder Straße 2, Bad Wimpfen, Baden-Württemberg, DE, 74206

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://qr.lidl.com/aephaeJ6
808/1000Good

Anpacker. Durchstarter. Möglichmacher. Alle reden vom Kundenfokus, Customer first, dem Kunden als König. Wir finden, das ist zu kurz gedacht und würden es so formulieren: Der Mensch ist Dreh- und Angelpunkt unseres Erfolgs. Dazu gehört neben einer Kunden- auch die Mita...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:84,511
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
5.11

5.11

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lidl in Germany

Lidl in Germany

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 5.11 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lidl in Germany in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 5.11 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

5.11 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lidl in Germany (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lidl in Germany cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
5.11

5.11

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
5.1130072725
Lidl in Germany

Lidl in Germany

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 5.11 company and Lidl in Germany company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 5.11 company and Lidl in Germany company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 5.11 company and Lidl in Germany company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 5.11 company and Lidl in Germany company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 5.11 company and Lidl in Germany company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 5.11 company and Lidl in Germany company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 5.11 company and Lidl in Germany company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 5.11 company and Lidl in Germany company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 5.11 company and Lidl in Germany company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 5.11 company and Lidl in Germany company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 5.11 company and Lidl in Germany company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 5.11 and Lidl in Germany, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 5.11 and Lidl in Germany, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 5.11 or Lidl in Germany ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 5.11 or Lidl in Germany ?
Between 5.11 and Lidl in Germany, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 5.11 and Lidl in Germany, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9