Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » 360 Dental Digilab » 3601769469125

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (3601769469125)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-58
Company Score Before Incident814 / 1000
Company Score After Incident756 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBER3601769469125
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized Access
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive patient information, including PII,...
INCIDENT DATE15/11/2025
STATUSOngoing (legal investigation)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of 360 Dental Digilab's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts 360 Dental Digilab Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the 360 Dental Digilab breach identified under incident ID 3601769469125.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of 360 Dental Digilab's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/360-dental-digilab, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Medical Equipment Manufacturing and the number of employees: 21 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 814 and after the incident was 756 with a difference of -58 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on 360 Dental Digilab and their customers.

On 15 January 2026, 360 Dental PC disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "360 Dental PC Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Patient Information for Over 11,000 Individuals".

A cybersecurity incident at 360 Dental PC involved unauthorized access to the practice’s internal server, where an attacker locked files and potentially exposed sensitive patient data.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Internal server, and exposing Sensitive patient information, including PII, dental records, and insurance details, with nearly 11,273 records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Breach notification to affected individuals.

The case underscores how Ongoing (legal investigation), teams are taking away lessons such as Highlights ongoing risks to healthcare providers handling sensitive patient information and the need for robust cybersecurity measures, and recommending next steps like Affected individuals should monitor financial and insurance records for suspicious activity, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Affected individuals advised to monitor financial and insurance records for suspicious activity.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to the practice’s internal server and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating internal server access suggests possible external exploitation. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attacker locked files on the internal server. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating attacker locked files on the internal server. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive patient data (SSNs, insurance details) exposed. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating names, SSNs, dental records, insurance details compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 11,273 individuals affected; data exposure confirmed. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating files were locked to evade detection during exfiltration. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (40%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (50%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (80%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Defense Evasion
Data Encrypted for Impact (70%)

Sources & References