What is the official website of 1Million Project Foundation ?

The official website of 1Million Project Foundation is http://www.1millionproject.org/.

What is 1Million Project Foundation's cybersecurity risk score?

1Million Project Foundation has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 751 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has 1Million Project Foundation experienced?

According to Rankiteo, 1Million Project Foundation currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has 1Million Project Foundation been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, 1Million Project Foundation has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does 1Million Project Foundation have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, 1Million Project Foundation is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does 1Million Project Foundation have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, 1Million Project Foundation does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does 1Million Project Foundation comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, 1Million Project Foundation is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does 1Million Project Foundation have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, 1Million Project Foundation does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does 1Million Project Foundation comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, 1Million Project Foundation is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does 1Million Project Foundation have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,1Million Project Foundation is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does 1Million Project Foundation operate in ?

1Million Project Foundation operates primarily in the Philanthropy industry.

How many employees does 1Million Project Foundation have ?

1Million Project Foundation employs approximately 1 people worldwide.

Does 1Million Project Foundation own any subsidiaries ?

1Million Project Foundation presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does 1Million Project Foundation have ?

1Million Project Foundation's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 703 followers.

Does 1Million Project Foundation have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, 1Million Project Foundation does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does 1Million Project Foundation have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, 1Million Project Foundation maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/1million-project.

How many cybersecurity incidents has 1Million Project Foundation experienced ?

As of August 2, 2026, Rankiteo reports that 1Million Project Foundation has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does 1Million Project Foundation have ?

1Million Project Foundation has an estimated 430 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has 1Million Project Foundation faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

1PF

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

751

/1000

Fair

776

/1000

Fair

1Million Project Foundation Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

1millionproject.org

Add Your Compliance Badge

Potential is everywhere. Opportunity is not. Our mission is to help 1 million high school students who do not have reliable Internet access at home reach their full potential by giving them mobile devices and free high-speed Internet access. More than 113,000 high school students participated in the 1Million Project program during the 2017-18 school year. Of these students, 84% say the 1Million Project enabled them to complete more homework in comfortable, convenient and safe places, 82% say they are more confident in their ability to succeed at school and 49% say the 1Million Project has improved their school attendance.

1PF A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

1PF

1Million Project Foundation CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

1Million Project Fo...

Breach

06/2019

SPR13427323

1Million Project Fo...

Breach

5/2017

SPR403072625

Loading…

A.I.

1PF Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for 1PF

Incidents vs Philanthropy Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 1Million Project Foundation in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 1Million Project Foundation in 2026.

Incident Types 1PF vs Philanthropy Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 1Million Project Foundation in 2026.

Incident History - 1PF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

1Million Project Foundation Subsidiaries

1PF

Philanthropy

Website: http://www.1millionproject.org/

Company Size: 10,001+ employees

SprintTelecommunications

Sprint BusinessTelecommunications

Loading…

1Million Project Foundation Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

1Million Project Foundation CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

January 28, 2026 01:17 PM

Italy Supports Ukraine with €1 Million to Boost Cybersecurity in Ternopil

Italy funds €1M under the Tallinn Mechanism to strengthen Ternopil's cyber resilience, secure networks, train personnel,...

Read Article

November 04, 2025 08:00 AM

Cyber Security Salaries, Jobs, and Career Growth in 2026

Find out which cyber security jobs pay the most in 2026. Learn about salary trends, in-demand skills, and career paths in the growing field...

Read Article

January 24, 2025 08:00 AM

Microsoft South Africa announces the launch of its AI skilling initiative to empower 1 million South Africans

Microsoft South Africa announced the launch of its AI skilling initiative to empower 1 million South Africans with in-demand digital skills...

Read Article

October 14, 2024 07:00 AM

College of Education Awarded $9.1 Million in Grant Funding From July to September, 2024

Faculty and researchers at the NC State College of Education, including the Belk Center for Community College Leadership and Research and...

Read Article

October 10, 2024 07:00 AM

£300k funding boost for high-flying Watchtower project

A pioneering £1million initiative to support the aerospace and advanced engineering industry in Lancashire has received further funding to...

Read Article

July 15, 2024 07:00 AM

Project 2025 Seeks to Dismantle Agencies, Terminate Up To 1 Million Federal Workers

What could happen to our government and the federal workforce in 2025? A group of conservative organizations have a plan, and it's not good...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-18556

SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel vulnerability in N-able N-central allows Authentication Bypass. This issue affects N-central: through 2026.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://uptime.n-able.com/

CVE-2026-55735

SUMMARY

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in ueberauth guardian allows an unauthenticated attacker to revoke a victim's session with a forged token. Guardian.revoke/3 in lib/guardian.ex decodes the supplied token with peek/1, which performs no signature verification (it only base64-decodes the JWT header and payload). The resulting unverified claims are forwarded directly to the configured token module's revoke callback and the implementation's on_revoke callback, a state-mutating sink. The sibling operations refresh/2 and exchange/4 both call decode_and_verify first, so the signature is checked before anything acts on the claims; revoke/3 is the only state-mutating path that acts on claims without verifying the signature. An attacker who knows or guesses a victim's identifying claim values (jti, sub) can forge a JWT carrying those claims, sign it with an arbitrary key, and submit it to any endpoint that funnels a caller-supplied token into Guardian.revoke/3 (the standard logout / session-revocation pattern). When the token module mutates state keyed by the claims (whitelist deletion or blacklist insertion, for example a GuardianDb-style store), the victim's legitimate session is evicted. This is an unauthenticated session-revocation denial of service; the attacker never needs the signing secret. This issue affects guardian: from 1.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55734

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in ueberauth guardian (Guardian.Permissions module) allows a denial of service via BEAM atom-table exhaustion. This vulnerability is associated with program file lib/guardian/permissions.ex and program routines 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':encode_permissions!/1, 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':encode_permissions_into_claims!/2, 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':do_encode_permissions!/2. The Guardian.Permissions mixin installs a public encode_permissions!/1 function on every module that does use Guardian.Permissions. For each key of the supplied map, encode_permissions!/1 calls String.to_atom(to_string(k)) before any validation runs. The integer-value clause of do_encode_permissions!/2 then short-circuits straight to encoding without validating the key against the configured permission set, so a key with an integer value is interned as a fresh atom with no exception raised. Atoms are never garbage collected and the BEAM atom table is a fixed-size resource (default roughly 1,048,576 entries), so each unique attacker-chosen key permanently consumes one slot. An attacker who can influence a permission map that reaches encode_permissions!/1 (for example a permissions map read from a request body and passed into token issuance via encode_permissions_into_claims!/2) can mint an unbounded number of atoms and exhaust the atom table, crashing the entire BEAM node and every service running on it. The sibling decode_permissions/1 is not affected because it skips keys absent from the configured permission set. This issue affects guardian: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55733

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in ueberauth guardian allows denial of service via unbounded atom creation from attacker-controlled binary input. Guardian.Permissions.AtomEncoding encodes permission scopes by passing arbitrary binaries to String.to_atom/1. When encode/3 in lib/guardian/permissions/atom_encoding.ex is called with a list, each binary entry is handled by the encode_value/3 binary clause, which calls String.to_atom(value) with no allow-list check. The perm_set argument (the application's small, finite set of legitimate permission names) is discarded, so any external string flows straight into atom creation. This encoder is selected with use Guardian.Permissions, encoding: Guardian.Permissions.AtomEncoding and reached through the imported encode/3 entry point. String.to_atom/1 creates a brand-new atom for every previously unseen binary, atoms are never garbage collected, and the BEAM atom table is fixed at roughly 1,048,576 entries by default. An application that funnels attacker-influenced permission scopes (from a request body, a JWT claim, or other external input) into encode/3 therefore mints one permanent atom per distinct value. A modest stream of varied, unauthenticated input permanently consumes the atom table and crashes the BEAM node with system_limit, taking down every application running on it. The default encoder is Guardian.Permissions.BitwiseEncoding, which is not affected. This issue affects guardian: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-54894

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in ueberauth guardian allows denial of service via unbounded atom creation from attacker-influenced binary input. Guardian.Plug.Keys derives connection and session namespace keys by passing arbitrary binaries to String.to_atom/1. base_key/1 in lib/guardian/plug/keys.ex converts any binary into the atom :"guardian_<input>", and the derived helpers claims_key/1, resource_key/1, and token_key/1 create a second atom on top of that. key_from_other/1 likewise converts a regex-captured binary through String.to_atom/1. The public specs advertise String.t() as a valid argument, so passing a string is documented usage, and higher-level entry points such as Guardian.Plug.current_token(conn, key: key) thread the caller-supplied key straight into these functions. String.to_atom/1 creates a brand-new atom for every previously unseen binary, atoms are never garbage collected, and the BEAM atom table is fixed at roughly 1,048,576 entries by default. An application that routes attacker-influenced data (a tenant identifier, header, or other request input) into a Guardian key therefore mints one permanent atom per distinct value. A modest stream of varied, unauthenticated input permanently consumes the atom table and crashes the BEAM node, taking down every application running on it. This issue affects guardian: from 0.1.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…