Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ПАТ "СК "УСГ"ПАТ "СК "УСГ"
VS
AflacAflac
ПАТ "СК "УСГ"

ПАТ "СК "УСГ"

вул. Івана Федорова, буд. 32-А, Київ, 03038, UA

Last Update: 19/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.usg.ua
754/1000Fair

СК «УСГ» – сучасна та динамічна страхова компанія національного масштабу зі 100% іноземним капіталом. З лютого 2008 року СК «УСГ» є повноправним членом родини всесвітньовідомої Vienna Insurance Group – лідера страхового ринку Центральної та Східної Європи. Це зробило к...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:114
Subsidiaries:55
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Aflac

Aflac

1932 Wynnton Rd, Columbus, 31999, US

Last Update: 13/08/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.aflac.com
370/1000Critical

Over 50 Million people worldwide have chosen Aflac because of our commitment to providing customers with the confidence that comes from knowing they have assistance in being prepared for whatever life may bring. With Aflac, whether you're a large business or a small o...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:17,986
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
8
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ПАТ "СК "УСГ"

ПАТ "СК "УСГ"

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aflac

Aflac

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ПАТ "СК "УСГ" in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

Aflac has 191.26% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - ПАТ "СК "УСГ" (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ПАТ "СК "УСГ" cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aflac (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aflac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ПАТ "СК "УСГ"

ПАТ "СК "УСГ"

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Aflac

Aflac

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AFL1782816142
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ADOCONAFLSON1786027126
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AFLJAGNUC1768389868

FAQ

Between ПАТ "СК "УСГ" company and Aflac company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ПАТ "СК "УСГ" company and Aflac company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ПАТ "СК "УСГ" company and Aflac company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ПАТ "СК "УСГ" company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ПАТ "СК "УСГ" company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ПАТ "СК "УСГ" company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ПАТ "СК "УСГ" company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ПАТ "СК "УСГ" company and Aflac company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ПАТ "СК "УСГ" company and Aflac company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ПАТ "СК "УСГ" company and Aflac company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ПАТ "СК "УСГ" company and Aflac company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ПАТ "СК "УСГ" and Aflac, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ПАТ "СК "УСГ" and Aflac, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ПАТ "СК "УСГ" or Aflac ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ПАТ "СК "УСГ" or Aflac ?
Between ПАТ "СК "УСГ" and Aflac, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ПАТ "СК "УСГ" and Aflac, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9