Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

+FRESH.i.AM++FRESH.i.AM+
VS
Under ArmourUnder Armour
+FRESH.i.AM+

+FRESH.i.AM+

undefined, Los Angeles, 650 S spring St, Apt 508, 90014, US

Last Update: 21/05/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.freshiam.net
817/1000Good

+F.i.A+ is a multi-tiered creative entity that brings together art, fashion, music, and culture. WE CREATE, RE-INVENT, LIVE LIFE, AND PUSH BOUNDARIES. We take ideas long past and give it a new spin. We aren't different nor anything new, but something fresh. Take it all ...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:12
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Under Armour

Under Armour

101 Performance Dr, Baltimore, 21230, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
100/1000Critical

Our Belief: WE USE THE POWER OF SPORTS TO EXPAND EVERY PLAYING FIELD. Our Obsession: WE ARE OBSESSED WITH ATHLETES WHO STRIVE FOR MORE – IN SPORTS, IN LIFE, AND IN THE WORLD. Our Mission: TO INSPIRE ATHLETES WITH INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE AND DESIGN SOLUTIONS THEY CAN’T LI...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:13,030
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
+FRESH.i.AM+

+FRESH.i.AM+

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Under Armour

Under Armour

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for +FRESH.i.AM+ in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

Under Armour has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - +FRESH.i.AM+ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

+FRESH.i.AM+ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Under Armour (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Under Armour cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
+FRESH.i.AM+

+FRESH.i.AM+

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Under Armour

Under Armour

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UND1769117511
🔒 Incident : Breach
UND1769174822
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UND3492734111825

FAQ

Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Under Armour company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Under Armour company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Under Armour company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Under Armour company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Under Armour company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Under Armour company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Under Armour company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Under Armour company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Under Armour company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Under Armour company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Under Armour company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ and Under Armour, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ and Under Armour, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - +FRESH.i.AM+ or Under Armour ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - +FRESH.i.AM+ or Under Armour ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ and Under Armour, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ and Under Armour, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1