Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa)Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa)
VS
Akamai TechnologiesAkamai Technologies
Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa)

Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa)

Gladsaxevej 378, Copenhagen, Capital Region, 2860, DK

Last Update: 12/02/2026

View Profile

As a service provider, you need a trusted partner with an agile local presence, essential expertise, and the flexibility to deliver fast, reliable broadband solutions for your customers. Enhance your competitive edge with feature-rich, future-forward, cutting-edge solu...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:25
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Akamai Technologies

Akamai Technologies

8 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA, US, 02142

Last Update: 28/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.akamai.com
732/1000Moderate

At Akamai, we make life better for billions of people, billions of times a day. Every day, billions of people around the world connect with their favorite brands to shop online, play the latest video games, log into mobile banking apps, learn remotely, share videos wi...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,327
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa)

Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Akamai Technologies

Akamai Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

Akamai Technologies has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Akamai Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Akamai Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa)

Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Akamai Technologies

Akamai Technologies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TOLTELAKA1777389934
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AKA1776515140
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
UNIAKA1773995078

FAQ

Between Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) and Akamai Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) and Akamai Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) or Akamai Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) or Akamai Technologies ?
Between Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) and Akamai Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Zyxel for Service Providers (Europe, Middle East & Africa) and Akamai Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8