Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Zyper (Acquired by Discord)

Zyper (Acquired by Discord) Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

zyper.com

Zyper is now part of @discord


Z A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Z
Company Information
Website:https://zyper.com/
Employees number:7
Number of followers:2,782
NAICS:5112
Industry Type:Software Development
Homepage:zyper.com
Z Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 550 and 599
logo
ZSoftware Development
Updated:
30/03/2026
557/1000
Very Poor
Ca
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Z Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
ZSoftware Development
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Z
ZVery Poor
Current Score
557Ca (VERY POOR)
01000
4 incidents
-48.5 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
575Before Incident
JULY 2026
571Before Incident
JUNE 2026
569Before Incident
MAY 2026
564Before Incident
APRIL 2026
562Before Incident
MARCH 2026
556Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
580Before Incident
Cyber Attack
02 Feb 2026Z
YouTube, Discord, Google, MediaFire, Telegram, Facebook and TikTok: Arsink RAT Targets Android Devices To Steal Data and Enable Remote Control

Arsink: Android Malware Exploits Cloud Tools for Large-Scale Data Theft

550After Incident
CRITICAL-30
MEDZYPTELMETTIKGOOYOU1770029110
Arsink: Android Malware Exploits Cloud Tools for Large-Scale Data Theft A sophisticated Android remote access trojan (RAT) dubbed Arsink has been uncovered, leveraging free cloud services to steal sensitive data and remotely control infected devices. Security firm Zimperium tracked the malware over several months, identifying 1,216 unique APK files, 317 Firebase command-and-control (C2) servers, and 45,000 victim IP addresses across 143 countries. ### Distribution & Deception Hackers distributed Arsink through Telegram channels, Discord posts, and MediaFire links, disguising it as modified or "pro" versions of popular apps from over 50 brands, including Google, YouTube, WhatsApp, Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook. Once installed, the malware requests excessive permissions, hides its icon, and operates covertly offering no legitimate functionality while harvesting data. ### Four Attack Variants Zimperium identified four primary Arsink variants, each using different cloud-based exfiltration methods: 1. Firebase + Google Apps Script – Small data (e.g., device info) is sent to Firebase Realtime Database, while larger files (photos, audio) are uploaded via Google Apps Script to Google Drive. 2. Telegram Exfiltration – SMS messages, call logs, and device details are transmitted directly to a hacker-controlled Telegram bot. 3. Embedded Dropper – A secondary payload is hidden within the app, extracted and renamed (e.g., Ai_App.zip to App.apk) without requiring internet downloads, evading detection. 4. Hybrid Cloud Abuse – Combines Firebase, Google Drive, and Telegram for data theft and command execution. ### Data Theft & Remote Control Arsink captures a full device snapshot, including: - Device details (model, battery, location, Google account emails) - SMS messages (including one-time passcodes) - Call logs & contacts - Microphone recordings (stored in cloud storage) - Photos & files (listed for potential upload) Attackers can remotely: - Toggle the flashlight, vibrate the phone, or play sounds - Change wallpaper, display messages, or speak text via text-to-speech - Initiate calls, manage files (upload, delete, wipe external storage) - Hide the app icon and maintain persistence via fake foreground notifications ### Global Impact & Victim Distribution The malware has infected users across the Middle East, Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Americas, with the highest concentrations in: - Egypt (13,000 infections) - Indonesia (7,000) - Iraq & Yemen (3,000 each) - Türkiye (2,000) - Pakistan & India (2,500 each) - Bangladesh (1,600) - Algeria & Morocco (1,000 each) India’s high infection rate correlates with frequent Telegram-based APK distribution. ### Mitigation & Response Zimperium collaborated with Google to dismantle malicious Firebase endpoints, Apps Scripts, and accounts. Google Play Protect now blocks known Arsink samples outside the Play Store. However, attackers rapidly adapt, making behavior-based detection critical for enterprises, particularly as the malware targets work-related credentials via SMS interception. Arsink’s use of legitimate cloud services for C2 operations highlights the growing challenge of detecting malware that blends into normal traffic.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Malware (Remote Access Trojan - RAT)
MOTIVATION
Data theftRemote device controlPotential financial gain (e.g., SMS interception for OTPs)
IMPACT
Device detailsSMS messages (including OTPs)Call logsContactsMicrophone recordingsPhotosFilesGoogle account emailsSystems Affected: Android devicesOperational Impact: Remote control of infected devices, potential credential theft, data exfiltrationBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage for brands whose apps were spoofed (e.g., Google, WhatsApp, Instagram)Identity Theft Risk: High (PII and OTP interception)Payment Information Risk: High (SMS-based OTP theft)
DATA BREACH
Device detailsSMS messagesCall logsContactsMicrophone recordingsPhotosFilesGoogle account emailsNumber Of Records Exposed: 45,000+ victim IP addresses (exact records unclear)Sensitivity Of Data: High (PII, OTPs, audio recordings, photos)APKsPhotosAudio recordingsText files
JANUARY 2026
579Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
576Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
573Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
634Before Incident
Breach
09 Oct 2025Z
Discord

Discord Third-Party Vendor Breach and Extortion Attempt (2025)

567After Incident
CRITICAL-67
ZYP2832128100925
Discord faced a major extortion attempt after cybercriminals breached its third-party customer service provider, Zendesk, compromising sensitive user data—including 2.1 million government-issued ID photos (driver’s licenses, passports) used for age verification. The attack, attributed to the Scattered Lapsus$ Hunters (SLH) group, exploited a compromised support agent account, granting unauthorized access for 58 hours. Stolen data also included usernames, email addresses, partial billing details (last four digits of credit cards), IP addresses, and customer service message logs. While attackers claimed 1.5TB of data (affecting 5.5M users), Discord disputed the scale, confirming ~70,000 users had ID photos exposed. The company refused ransom demands, terminated the vendor relationship, and launched forensic investigations with law enforcement. The breach underscores supply chain risks and the dangers of storing sensitive verification documents with third parties. The threat of public data leaks remains active, with potential long-term repercussions for affected users, including identity theft and fraud.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data BreachExtortionSupply Chain Attack
MOTIVATION
Financial Gain (Ransom Extortion)Data Theft for Dark Web SaleReputational Damage
IMPACT
Government-Issued ID Photos (Driver’s Licenses, Passports)User NamesDiscord UsernamesEmail AddressesBilling Information (Payment Methods, Last 4 Digits of Credit Cards)Customer Service Message ExchangesUser IP AddressesSupport Ticket Data (8.4M tickets)Zendesk Customer Support PlatformDiscord Trust & Safety Ticketing SystemsTermination of Third-Party Vendor PartnershipRevocation of All Vendor Access to Ticketing SystemsInternal Investigation and Forensic AnalysisCollaboration with Law Enforcement and Data Protection AuthoritiesHigh (Sensitive Data Exposure)Loss of User TrustMedia ScrutinyPotential Regulatory Fines (GDPR, CCPA, etc.)Class-Action Lawsuits (Pending)High (Exposed Government IDs)Phishing/Social Engineering RisksLimited (Last 4 Digits of Credit Cards Only)
DATA BREACH
Personally Identifiable Information (PII)Government-Issued Identification DocumentsFinancial Data (Partial)Support Interaction RecordsConfirmed: 70,000 users (ID photos)Claimed By Threat Actor: 2,185,151 ID photos; 5.5M users across 8.4M support ticketsSensitivity Of Data: High (Government IDs, PII, Billing Info)Data Exfiltration: Yes (1.5TB of Data Claimed by Threat Actors)Image Files (JPEG/PNG of IDs)Text-Based Support TicketsCSV/Database ExportsFull NamesDiscord UsernamesEmail AddressesIP AddressesPartial Credit Card Numbers (Last 4 Digits)
SEPTEMBER 2025
633Before Incident
MAY 2025
688Before Incident
Breach
01 May 2025Z
Discord

Discord Third-Party Customer Service Data Breach

621After Incident
CRITICAL-67
ZYP3792137100525
Discord, a communication platform with over 200 million users, suffered a data breach via a third-party customer service provider. The hackers accessed a limited number of users' data, including those who had interacted with Discord’s Customer Support or Trust & Safety teams. Compromised information may include names, Discord usernames, emails, contact details, partial billing data (last four digits of credit cards, payment type, purchase history), IP addresses, messages with support agents, and a small number of government-ID images (e.g., driver’s licenses, passports) from age-verification appeals. While full credit card numbers, CVVs, passwords, authentication data, and general Discord activity/messages remained secure, the breach was conducted for financial extortion. Discord revoked the vendor’s access, launched an investigation, involved forensics experts, and engaged law enforcement to mitigate the incident.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
data breachthird-party breachextortion attempt
MOTIVATION
financial extortion
IMPACT
namesDiscord usernamesemail addressescontact details (if provided to customer support)limited billing information (payment type, last four digits of credit card, purchase history)IP addressesmessages with customer service agentslimited corporate data (training materials, internal presentations)government-ID images (e.g., driver’s licenses, passports) from age-determination appealsthird-party customer service ticketing systemOperational Impact: revoked third-party access, internal investigation, forensic support engagementBrand Reputation Impact: potential trust erosion due to third-party breach and exposure of sensitive user dataIdentity Theft Risk: moderate (PII and government IDs exposed)Payment Information Risk: low (only last four digits of credit cards; full numbers and CVV secure)
DATA BREACH
personally identifiable information (PII)payment information (partial)communication logscorporate documentsgovernment-issued IDsNumber Of Records Exposed: limited (exact number undisclosed)Sensitivity Of Data: high (includes PII and government IDs)text (emails, messages)images (IDs)documents (training materials, presentations)
SEPTEMBER 2023
749Before Incident
Breach
01 Sep 2023Z
Discord

Discord Third-Party Vendor Data Breach Exposes 70,000 Users' Government-Issued ID Photos

658After Incident
CRITICAL-91
ZYP0632206100925
Discord experienced a security breach via a third-party customer service vendor, exposing government-issued ID photos of approximately 70,000 users. The incident, discovered in late September 2023, targeted the platform’s age verification system used for reviewing user appeals. While Discord clarified this was not a direct breach of its core systems, the attackers accessed usernames, email addresses, contact details, partial billing information (last four digits of credit cards), IP addresses, and customer support messages. The hackers attempted extortion by demanding a ransom, with online claims suggesting they possessed more data than Discord acknowledged—though the company dismissed these as inflated. No full credit card numbers, passwords, or private Discord messages beyond support interactions were compromised. Discord revoked the vendor’s access, engaged forensic investigators, and collaborated with law enforcement. The breach highlights risks tied to third-party dependencies in handling sensitive user data, particularly in identity verification processes.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data BreachThird-Party Vendor CompromiseExtortion Attempt
MOTIVATION
Financial Extortion
IMPACT
Government-issued ID photos (~70,000 users)UsernamesEmail addressesContact detailsLast four digits of credit cardsIP addressesMessages exchanged with customer service agentsAge verification systemThird-party customer support ticketing systemVendor access revokedForensic investigation initiatedBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to exposure of sensitive user data and extortion claimsIdentity Theft Risk: High (government-issued IDs exposed)Payment Information Risk: Low (only last four digits of credit cards compromised)
DATA BREACH
Government-issued identification photosPersonally identifiable information (PII)Partial payment informationCustomer support communicationsNumber Of Records Exposed: ~70,000 (government IDs); additional records for other data types (quantity unspecified)Sensitivity Of Data: High (government IDs, PII)Image files (ID photos)Text-based support messages

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Z ?
?
What was Z's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was Z's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was Z's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Z's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Z's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Z's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Z's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Z's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Z's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Z's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Z's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Z's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Z ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Z's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?