Comparison Overview
ZTE Corporation

ZTE Corporation
ZTE Corporation Hi-Tech Road South, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, CN, 518057
Last Update: 01/04/2026
ZTE connects the world with continuous innovation for a better future. The company provides innovative technologies and integrated solutions, and its portfolio spans communication networks, computing infrastructure, industry digital solutions, and personal and home sm...

Telia
Stjärntorget 1, SOLNA, -, SE, SE-169 94
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Our 15 000 talented colleagues serve millions of customers every day in one of the world’s most connected regions. With a strong connectivity base, we’re the hub in the digital ecosystem, empowering people, companies and societies to stay in touch with everything that m...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ZTE Corporation







Telia






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ZTE Corporation in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
Telia has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - ZTE Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ZTE Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Telia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Telia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ZTE Corporation

Telia
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.