Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ZTE USAZTE USA
VS
Voltas Limited - A TATA EnterpriseVoltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise
ZTE USA

ZTE USA

N/A

Last Update: 30/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.zteusa.com/
771/1000Fair

ZTE USA is the world's 4th largest mobile handset manufacturer.The company draws on more than 25 years of experience to deliver smart, affordable, quality choices for customers nationwide.

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

Voltas House , A Block, Chinchpokli, Mumbai, Mumbai, 400033, IN

Last Update: 19/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.voltas.com/
796/1000Fair

Voltas is the No. 1* Room Air Conditioner Brand in India. Apart from ACs, Voltas offers a wide range of cooling products including Air Coolers, Commercial Refrigeration, Water Coolers and Water Dispensers. Apart from being the leaders in consumer products, Voltas is als...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:14,055
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ZTE USA

ZTE USA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ZTE USA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ZTE USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ZTE USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ZTE USA

ZTE USA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ZTE USA company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ZTE USA company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ZTE USA company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ZTE USA company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ZTE USA company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ZTE USA company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ZTE USA company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ZTE USA company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ZTE USA company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ZTE USA company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ZTE USA company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ZTE USA and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ZTE USA and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ZTE USA or Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ZTE USA or Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise ?
Between ZTE USA and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ZTE USA and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA