Comparison Overview
Zoho Indonesia
Zoho Indonesia
Jakarta, Indonesia, ID
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Dalam 25 tahun terakhir, Zoho Corporation telah menjadi salah satu perusahaan terkemuka dalam rekayasa perangkat lunak di balik tiga merek besar: Zoho, ManageEngine, dan WebNMS. Zoho menawarkan piranti lunak kelas dunia untuk mengembangkan bisnis anda. Dengan lebih da...
T-Systems International
Hahnstraße 43d, Frankfurt am Main, 60528, DE
Last Update: 08/10/2026
Your digitalization partner with industry expertise With locations in more than 26 countries and over 26,000 employees (2024), T-Systems is one of the leading providers of digital services in Europe. The Deutsche Telekom subsidiary is headquartered in Germany and has a...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Zoho Indonesia
T-Systems International
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Zoho Indonesia in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
T-Systems International has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Zoho Indonesia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Zoho Indonesia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - T-Systems International (X = Date, Y = Severity)
T-Systems International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Zoho Indonesia
T-Systems International
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.