Comparison Overview

Zoho

VS

Intuit

Zoho

Zoho Corporation Pvt. Ltd, Estancia IT Park, Plot No. 140 & 151,, Chennai, 603202, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.zoho.com/

Zoho offers beautifully smart software to help you grow your business. With over 100 million users worldwide, Zoho's 55+ products aid your sales and marketing, support and collaboration, finance, and recruitment needs—letting you focus only on your business. Zoho respects user privacy and does not have an ad-revenue model in any part of its business, including its free products. Zoho Corporation is privately held and profitable, with its headquarters in Chennai, India, and offices across the globe.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 29,539
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Intuit

2700 Coast Ave, Mountain View, California, US, 94043
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749
https://www.intuit.com/

Intuit is a global technology platform that helps our customers and communities overcome their most important financial challenges. Serving millions of customers worldwide with TurboTax, QuickBooks, Credit Karma and Mailchimp, we believe that everyone should have the opportunity to prosper and we work tirelessly to find new, innovative ways to deliver on this belief. We encourage conversations on this page and will not delete comments that follow our terms of use. In order to keep this a safe community, the below posts may be removed: Repeated posts of the same content, spam or posts from fake accounts or profiles, offensive language or material, threats to others in the community, posts deliberately aimed to have a negative effect on the community or conversations.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 17,165
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoho.jpeg
Zoho
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intuit.jpeg
Intuit
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zoho
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Intuit
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Zoho has 75.44% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Intuit has 250.88% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Zoho (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zoho cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Intuit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intuit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoho.jpeg
Zoho
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Authentication Bypass
Motivation: Account Takeover, Access Sensitive Data
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intuit.jpeg
Intuit
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Account Compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Zoho company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Intuit company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Intuit company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Zoho company.

In the current year, Intuit company has reported more cyber incidents than Zoho company.

Neither Intuit company nor Zoho company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Intuit company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Zoho company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Intuit company nor Zoho company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Zoho company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Intuit company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Zoho nor Intuit holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Intuit company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Zoho company.

Zoho company employs more people globally than Intuit company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Zoho nor Intuit holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zoho nor Intuit holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zoho nor Intuit holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zoho nor Intuit holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zoho nor Intuit holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zoho nor Intuit holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References