Comparison Overview
Zoho Vietnam

Zoho Vietnam
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, VN
Last Update: 12/03/2026
Với lịch sử hơn 26 năm hình thành và phát triển, Zoho Corporation đã vươn lên trở thành một trong những tập đoàn công nghệ hàng đầu trên thế giới với ba mảng hoạt động chính: Zoho, ManageEngine, và WebNMS. Zoho tự hào cung cấp đến khách hàng những công cụ phần mềm hiện...

Mindtree
Bangalore, India - New Jersey, USA, Bangalore, 560059, IN
Last Update: 01/04/2026
LTIMindtree is a global technology consulting and digital solutions company that enables enterprises across industries to reimagine business models, accelerate innovation, and maximize growth by harnessing digital technologies. As a digital transformation partner to mor...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Zoho Vietnam







Mindtree






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Zoho Vietnam in 2026.
Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mindtree in 2026.
Incident History - Zoho Vietnam (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Zoho Vietnam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Mindtree (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mindtree cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Zoho Vietnam

Mindtree
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.