Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Zoho BooksZoho Books
VS
Alibaba GroupAlibaba Group
Zoho Books

Zoho Books

4708 HWY 71 E, Austin, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.zoho.com/books/
758/1000Fair

Zoho Books is a comprehensive, cloud-based accounting platform that streamlines your day-to-day business accounting, simplifies reconciliation and automates business workflows. With an innovation-driven approach, Zoho Books offers an interface that is packed with insigh...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Alibaba Group

Alibaba Group

969 West Wen Yi Road, Hangzhou, 311121, CN

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.alibabagroup.com
749/1000Moderate

🌍Alibaba Group is on a mission to make it easy to do business anywhere! Guided by our passion and imagination, we’re leading the way in AI, cloud computing and e-commerce. We aim to build the future infrastructure of commerce, and we aspire to be a good company that l...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:84,600
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Zoho Books

Zoho Books

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Alibaba Group

Alibaba Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zoho Books in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Alibaba Group has 296.04% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Zoho Books (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zoho Books cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Alibaba Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alibaba Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Zoho Books

Zoho Books

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Alibaba Group

Alibaba Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ALIFAS1784996806
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ALI1773938860
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
JUNALI1773930337

FAQ

Between Zoho Books company and Alibaba Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Zoho Books company and Alibaba Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Zoho Books company and Alibaba Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Zoho Books company and Alibaba Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Zoho Books company and Alibaba Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Zoho Books company and Alibaba Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Zoho Books company and Alibaba Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Zoho Books company and Alibaba Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Zoho Books company and Alibaba Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Zoho Books company and Alibaba Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Zoho Books company and Alibaba Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Zoho Books and Alibaba Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Zoho Books and Alibaba Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Zoho Books or Alibaba Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Zoho Books or Alibaba Group ?
Between Zoho Books and Alibaba Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Zoho Books and Alibaba Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA