Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
VS
Microchip Technology Inc.Microchip Technology Inc.
ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.

ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.

3601 E. Plano PKWY STE 200, Plano, 75074, US

Last Update: 24/02/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

Delivering high quality, on time Custom Test and embedded solutions. www.zlantechnologies.com

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:7
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Microchip Technology Inc.

Microchip Technology Inc.

Chandler, AZ, US

Last Update: 26/05/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.microchip.com/
597/1000Very Poor

Microchip Technology Inc. is a leading semiconductor supplier of smart, connected and secure embedded control solutions. Its easy-to-use development tools and comprehensive product portfolio enable customers to create optimal designs which reduce risk while lowering tot...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:17,217
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.

ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Microchip Technology Inc.

Microchip Technology Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. has 58.68% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Microchip Technology Inc. has 6.54% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Microchip Technology Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microchip Technology Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.

ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ZLA1771281217
Microchip Technology Inc.

Microchip Technology Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MYPMIC1779819824
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MIC742060625
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MIC740060625

FAQ

Between ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. and Microchip Technology Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. and Microchip Technology Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. or Microchip Technology Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. or Microchip Technology Inc. ?
Between ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. and Microchip Technology Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ZLAN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. and Microchip Technology Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-47238
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #133, a normal authenticated user can edit another user's video subtitles because of a lack of authorization. They can upload subtitles, edit their name or delete them. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #133.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-45418
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #132, any authenticated user who can upload videos can add multiple subtitles from different files and change their title (English, Spanish...). The POST /actions/subtitle_edit.php request used to change their title includes a number parameter which is vulnerable to SQL Injection. A boolean-based blind SQL injection can be used to exfiltrate sensitive data. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #132.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-45060
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #129, the actions/progress_video.php endpoint is vulnerable to blind SQL injection. Any unauthenticated user can exploit the ids parameter to execute SQL queries and exfiltrate sensitive data. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #129.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-42846
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #140, ClipBucket's Remote Play feature allows any authenticated user to add a video by importing an external URL as the source. Some shell commands are run with the URL as a parameter. The URL is concatenated directly into shell commands without escaping then executed, so any shell metacharacter in the URL is interpreted. This results in arbitrary command execution. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #140.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-6250
SUMMARY

An authenticated format string vulnerability exists in the ONVIF service of Tapo C110 v2 due to improper handling of user-controlled input.  Externally controlled data is interpreted as a format string, which can be used to manipulate stack memory, including control flow data such as return addresses. A remote authenticated attacker may redirect execution flow to existing internal functions, triggering an unauthorized factory reset, leading to loss of configuration, deletion of stored credentials and service disruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA