Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ZITADELZITADEL
VS
PedidosYaPedidosYa
ZITADEL

ZITADEL

Four Embarcadero Center, San Francisco, 94111, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://zitadel.com
745/1000Moderate

ZITADEL - Identity infrastructure, simplified for you.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:23
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
PedidosYa

PedidosYa

La Cumparsita 1475, 11200 Montevideo, Departamento de Montevideo, Montevideo, Montevideo, UY, 11200

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
790/1000Fair

We’re  the delivery market leader in Latin America. Our platform connects over 77.000 restaurants, supermarkets, pharmacies and stores with millions of users. Nowadays we operate in more than 500 cities in Latinamerica. And we are now over 3.400 employees. PedidosYa is ...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:13,651
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ZITADEL

ZITADEL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PedidosYa

PedidosYa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

ZITADEL has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PedidosYa in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ZITADEL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ZITADEL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PedidosYa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PedidosYa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ZITADEL

ZITADEL

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ZIT1773052021
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ZIT404030625
PedidosYa

PedidosYa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ZITADEL company and PedidosYa company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ZITADEL company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ZITADEL company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ZITADEL company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ZITADEL company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ZITADEL company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ZITADEL company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ZITADEL company and PedidosYa company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ZITADEL company and PedidosYa company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ZITADEL company and PedidosYa company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ZITADEL company and PedidosYa company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ZITADEL and PedidosYa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ZITADEL and PedidosYa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ZITADEL or PedidosYa ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ZITADEL or PedidosYa ?
Between ZITADEL and PedidosYa, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ZITADEL and PedidosYa, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3