Comparison Overview
ZIRILIO

ZIRILIO
502/55 Lime Street, Sydney, 2000, AU
Last Update: 20/03/2026
With ZIRILIO on your side, the digital world just became safer. ZIRILIO is an end-to-end security solutions organisation. We provide the most sophisticated, personalised cyber security solutions in the market backed by world leading experts and Gartner technology vendo...

G4S
6th Floor, London, SW1H 0DB, GB
Last Update: 01/04/2026
G4S is a leading security and facility services company that provides proactive security services and cutting-edge smart technology to deliver tailored, integrated security solutions that allow clients to focus on their core business. Through a global workforce of appro...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ZIRILIO







G4S






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ZIRILIO in 2026.
Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for G4S in 2026.
Incident History - ZIRILIO (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ZIRILIO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - G4S (X = Date, Y = Severity)
G4S cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ZIRILIO

G4S
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.