Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ZimbraZimbra
VS
PedidosYaPedidosYa
Zimbra

Zimbra

30 Cecil Street, Downtown Core, 049712, SG

Last Update: 20/08/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
https://www.zimbra.com
594/1000Very Poor

Zimbra offers businesses a secure, data-sovereign email and collaboration platform built on open standards. A low-risk alternative, it provides integrated email, calendar, contacts, tasks, and document sharing. Businesses gain complete control over their data with flex...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:118
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
PedidosYa

PedidosYa

La Cumparsita 1475, 11200 Montevideo, Departamento de Montevideo, Montevideo, Montevideo, UY, 11200

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
790/1000Fair

We’re  the delivery market leader in Latin America. Our platform connects over 77.000 restaurants, supermarkets, pharmacies and stores with millions of users. Nowadays we operate in more than 500 cities in Latinamerica. And we are now over 3.400 employees. PedidosYa is ...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:13,651
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Zimbra

Zimbra

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PedidosYa

PedidosYa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Zimbra has 466.04% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PedidosYa in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Zimbra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zimbra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PedidosYa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PedidosYa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Zimbra

Zimbra

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ZIM1787214230
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CHE1784787889
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ZIM1783765567
PedidosYa

PedidosYa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Zimbra company and PedidosYa company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Zimbra company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Zimbra company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Zimbra company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Zimbra company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Zimbra company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Zimbra company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Zimbra company and PedidosYa company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Zimbra company and PedidosYa company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Zimbra company and PedidosYa company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Zimbra company and PedidosYa company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Zimbra and PedidosYa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Zimbra and PedidosYa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Zimbra or PedidosYa ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Zimbra or PedidosYa ?
Between Zimbra and PedidosYa, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Zimbra and PedidosYa, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-77648
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Glance through 32.0.0, the /v2/tasks API accepts type=import tasks that bypass import_filtering_opts, allowing an admin to fetch internal URLs from the Glance service network (aka SSRF), as long as https:// or http:// is used. This API has been available only to admins since Xena, and it has been deprecated for several releases.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.7
CVE-2026-77647
SUMMARY

SPIP before 4.4.20 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, as exploited in the wild in August 2026. This is related to incorrect identification of <?php blocks, and var_export's mishandling of certain cases such as presence of a '<' character.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-77113
SUMMARY

Path traversal in apport-unpack in Canonical Apport before 2.36.0, 2.34.2, and 2.28.4 on Linux allows an attacker to create or overwrite arbitrary files with the privileges of the executing user via an attacker controlled key names in crash report files.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-77646
SUMMARY

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill PDMLink and PTC FlexPLM. The vulnerability may be exploited through the deserialization of untrusted data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:U/V:D/RE:M/U:Red
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-77645
SUMMARY

A critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill and PTC FlexPLM. The vulnerability may be exploited through the deserialization of untrusted data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Red
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA