Comparison Overview
ZF Race Engineering
ZF Race Engineering
Ernst-Sachs Straße 62, Schweinfurt, Bavaria, DE, 97424
Last Update: 12/06/2026
ZF Race Engineering is where chassis and powertrain performance are engineered under the toughest conditions in motorsport — and transferred directly to high-performance road and small-series applications. We develop complete vehicle performance solutions that turn dat...
Ford Motor Company
1 American Rd, Dearborn, 48126, US
Last Update: 07/10/2026
We don't just make history -- we make the future. Ford put the world on wheels over a century ago, and our teams are re-inventing icons and creating groundbreaking connected and electric vehicles for the next century. We believe in serving our customers, our communities...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
ZF Race Engineering
Ford Motor Company
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ZF Race Engineering in 2026.
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ford Motor Company in 2026.
Incident History - ZF Race Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ZF Race Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ford Motor Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ford Motor Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
ZF Race Engineering
Ford Motor Company
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.