Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Zest ReplyZest Reply
VS
KyndrylKyndryl
Zest Reply

Zest Reply

Gulledelle 96, St-Lambrechts-Woluwe, 1200, BE

Last Update: 20/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.reply.com/zest-reply/en/
750/1000Fair

Zest Reply was born with the ambition to help customers deploy Enterprise levels Generative AI Solutions with a focus on Customer Engagement, Compliance Reporting and applications to Software Development.

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:6
Subsidiaries:124
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Kyndryl

Kyndryl

New York City, US

Last Update: 17/08/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://kyndryl.com
733/1000Moderate

We have the world’s best talent that design, run, and manage the most advanced and reliable technology infrastructure each day. Together, we think holistically about the health of these vital technology ecosystems. We are a focused, independent company that builds on o...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:61,535
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Zest Reply

Zest Reply

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kyndryl

Kyndryl

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zest Reply in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Kyndryl has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Zest Reply (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zest Reply cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kyndryl (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kyndryl cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Zest Reply

Zest Reply

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Kyndryl

Kyndryl

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HCLTAT1786448292
🔒 Incident : Breach
IHGHCLGAPWYNMCDVODKYNMIC1786975327

FAQ

Between Zest Reply company and Kyndryl company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Zest Reply company and Kyndryl company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Zest Reply company and Kyndryl company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Zest Reply company and Kyndryl company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Zest Reply company and Kyndryl company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Zest Reply company and Kyndryl company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Zest Reply company and Kyndryl company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Zest Reply company and Kyndryl company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Zest Reply company and Kyndryl company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Zest Reply company and Kyndryl company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Zest Reply company and Kyndryl company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Zest Reply and Kyndryl, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Zest Reply and Kyndryl, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Zest Reply or Kyndryl ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Zest Reply or Kyndryl ?
Between Zest Reply and Kyndryl, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Zest Reply and Kyndryl, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES