Comparison Overview
Zest Reply

Zest Reply
Gulledelle 96, St-Lambrechts-Woluwe, 1200, BE
Last Update: 20/12/2025
Zest Reply was born with the ambition to help customers deploy Enterprise levels Generative AI Solutions with a focus on Customer Engagement, Compliance Reporting and applications to Software Development.

Engineering Group
Piazzale dell'agricoltura, 24, Roma, Lazio, IT, 00144
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Engineering Group is the Digital Transformation Company, leader in Italy and expanding its global footprint, with around 14,000 associates and with over 80 offices spread across Europe, the United States, and South America and global delivery. The Engineering Group, c...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Zest Reply







Engineering Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Zest Reply in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Engineering Group in 2026.
Incident History - Zest Reply (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Zest Reply cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Engineering Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Engineering Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Zest Reply

Engineering Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.