Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ZeroFoxZeroFox
VS
Palo Alto NetworksPalo Alto Networks
ZeroFox

ZeroFox

1500 Whetstone Way, Baltimore, Maryland, US, 21230

Last Update: 25/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.zerofox.com/
502/1000Critical

ZeroFox is the solution to discover, validate, and disrupt external cyber threats before they harm revenue or reputation. Our unified platform fuses Threat Intelligence, Brand and Domain Protection, Attack Surface Intelligence, Executive Protection and Physical Security...

NAICS:541514
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:855
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Palo Alto Networks

Palo Alto Networks

3000 Tannery Way, SANTA CLARA, 95054, US

Last Update: 04/10/2026

View Profile
585/1000Very Poor

Palo Alto Networks, the global cybersecurity leader, is shaping the cloud-centric future with technology that is transforming the way people and organizations operate. Our mission is to be the cybersecurity partner of choice, protecting our digital way of life. We help ...

NAICS:541514
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:22,839
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
14
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ZeroFox

ZeroFox

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Palo Alto Networks

Palo Alto Networks

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)

ZeroFox has 94.17% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)

Palo Alto Networks has 1272.55% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - ZeroFox (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ZeroFox cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Palo Alto Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Palo Alto Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ZeroFox

ZeroFox

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ZER1774348050
🔒 Incident : Breach
ZER1774975100
Palo Alto Networks

Palo Alto Networks

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FORCHEMIKPALMICODIADOITR1789359970
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NUCPALZYXWESSEC1790066961
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CHEFORPALCIT1784881580

FAQ

Between ZeroFox company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ZeroFox company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ZeroFox company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ZeroFox company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ZeroFox company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ZeroFox company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ZeroFox company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ZeroFox company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ZeroFox company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ZeroFox company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ZeroFox company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ZeroFox and Palo Alto Networks, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ZeroFox and Palo Alto Networks, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ZeroFox or Palo Alto Networks ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ZeroFox or Palo Alto Networks ?
Between ZeroFox and Palo Alto Networks, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ZeroFox and Palo Alto Networks, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9