Comparison Overview
ZEISS Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology

ZEISS Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
Rudolf-Eber-Straße 2, Oberkochen, Baden-Württemberg, DE, 73447
Last Update: 03/02/2026
Have you made a call with your mobile phone today? Or sent an e-mail? Not only then, but precisely at this moment while you’re surfing the Internet, you’ve most likely been in indirect contact with the ZEISS Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology segment! Without our t...

onsemi
5701 N. Pima Rd, Scottsdale, Arizona, US, 85250
Last Update: 17/09/2026
onsemi (Nasdaq: ON) is driving disruptive innovations to help build a better future. With a focus on automotive and industrial end-markets, the company is accelerating change in megatrends such as vehicle electrification and safety, sustainable energy grids, industrial ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ZEISS Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology







onsemi






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ZEISS Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology in 2026.
Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for onsemi in 2026.
Incident History - ZEISS Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ZEISS Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - onsemi (X = Date, Y = Severity)
onsemi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ZEISS Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology

onsemi
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.