Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM)Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM)
VS
Iron MountainIron Mountain
Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM)

Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM)

Šmartinska cesta 53, Ljubljana, 1000, SI

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://zcam.zurich.com
796/1000Fair

Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) is a data analytics company focused on driving customer-centricity in the insurance industry.

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:6
Subsidiaries:31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Iron Mountain

Iron Mountain

33 Arch St, Boston, 02110, US

Last Update: 07/05/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.ironmountain.com
806/1000Good

In the era of AI, your data is your advantage. Yet too often it remains untapped: disconnected from systems, underutilized, untrained, and exposed to risk. Iron Mountain is the trusted partner for organizations of all sizes to unlock what’s possible, transforming inform...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:23,332
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM)

Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Iron Mountain

Iron Mountain

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Iron Mountain in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Iron Mountain (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Iron Mountain cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM)

Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Iron Mountain

Iron Mountain

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) company and Iron Mountain company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) company and Iron Mountain company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) company and Iron Mountain company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) company and Iron Mountain company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) company and Iron Mountain company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) company and Iron Mountain company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) company and Iron Mountain company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) company and Iron Mountain company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) company and Iron Mountain company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) company and Iron Mountain company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) company and Iron Mountain company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) and Iron Mountain, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) and Iron Mountain, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) or Iron Mountain ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) or Iron Mountain ?
Between Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) and Iron Mountain, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Zurich Customer Active Management (ZCAM) and Iron Mountain, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8