Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc.ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc.
VS
StrykerStryker
ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc.

ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc.

590 Taylor Way, San Carlos, California, 94070, US

Last Update: 21/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://zapsurgical.com
759/1000Fair

Leveraging unique gyroscopic motion, ZAP-X® opens new frontiers in modern radiosurgery. Combining self-shielding technology with high dose rate linear-accelerator delivery, ZAP-X was created to safely treat more patients in more places.

NAICS:339
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:108
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Stryker

Stryker

2825 Airview Boulevard, Kalamazoo, MI, US, 49002

Last Update: 29/05/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.stryker.com
557/1000Very Poor

Stryker is a global leader in medical technologies and, together with our customers, we are driven to make healthcare better. We offer innovative products and services in MedSurg, Neurotechnology and Orthopaedics that help improve patient and healthcare outcomes. Alongs...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:50,225
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
14
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc.

ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Stryker

Stryker

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Stryker has 1184.4% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Stryker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stryker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc.

ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Stryker

Stryker

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STR1779337852
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STR1779452900
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DOWSTR1775838732

FAQ

Between ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. company and Stryker company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. company and Stryker company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. company and Stryker company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. company and Stryker company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. company and Stryker company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. company and Stryker company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. company and Stryker company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. and Stryker, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. and Stryker, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. or Stryker ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. or Stryker ?
Between ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. and Stryker, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. and Stryker, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-53465
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to version 7.1.2-25, a crafted multi-frame can result in a heap buffer over-write when encoding it with the SF3 encoder. This issue has been patched in version 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-53464
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to version 7.1.2-25, when providing invalid options to the wand option parser a small memory leak will occur. This issue has been patched in version 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-53463
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25, when passing incorrect arguments in the distort operation a null pointer deference will occur. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-53462
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25, when an allocation fails in CheckPrimitiveExtent this can result in a heap-use-after-free and result in a crash. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-53461
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25, an incorrect loop in the ICON decoder can result in an out of bounds heap write resulting in a crash. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9