Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Zagrebačka bankaZagrebačka banka
VS
SEBSEB
Zagrebačka banka

Zagrebačka banka

Trg bana Josipa Jelačića 10, Zagreb, 10 000, HR

Last Update: 25/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.zaba.hr
761/1000Fair

Osnažujemo razvoj zajednice. Svrha je UniCreditova postojanja osnažiti zajednice kako bi mogle napredovati, ispuniti očekivanja svih naših dionika u cijeloj Europi i osloboditi potencijal svakog pojedinca kojem smo na usluzi, kao i svake zajednice. UniCredit je pane...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:2,030
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SEB

SEB

Kungsträdgårdsgatan 8, Stockholm, 10640, SE

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.sebgroup.com
811/1000Good

SEB is a leading northern European financial services group with a strong belief that entrepreneurial minds and innovative companies are key in creating a better world. SEB takes a long-term perspective and supports its customers in good times and bad. In Sweden and ...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:21,307
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Zagrebačka banka

Zagrebačka banka

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SEB

SEB

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zagrebačka banka in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SEB in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Zagrebačka banka (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zagrebačka banka cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SEB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SEB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Zagrebačka banka

Zagrebačka banka

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SEB

SEB

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Zagrebačka banka company and SEB company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Zagrebačka banka company and SEB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Zagrebačka banka company and SEB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Zagrebačka banka company and SEB company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Zagrebačka banka company and SEB company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Zagrebačka banka company and SEB company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Zagrebačka banka company and SEB company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Zagrebačka banka company and SEB company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Zagrebačka banka company and SEB company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Zagrebačka banka company and SEB company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Zagrebačka banka company and SEB company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Zagrebačka banka and SEB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Zagrebačka banka and SEB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Zagrebačka banka or SEB ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Zagrebačka banka or SEB ?
Between Zagrebačka banka and SEB, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Zagrebačka banka and SEB, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-84411
SUMMARY

The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105051
SUMMARY

Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 1.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.5
CVE-2026-105050
SUMMARY

PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-105049
SUMMARY

Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105048
SUMMARY

The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2