Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

YuzuYello | an IPG Health CompanyYuzuYello | an IPG Health Company
VS
Publicis GroupePublicis Groupe
YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company

YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company

N/A

Last Update: 11/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://yuzuyello.com
750/1000Fair

Here at YuzuYello, we’re all about closing the gap between the consumer and pharma experience. How do we do that? By delivering warmer, brighter, more considerate patient support. Our behavioral scientists, learning strategists and content creators design the kind of ...

NAICS:541613
NAICS Definition:Marketing Consulting Services
Employees:52
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Publicis Groupe

Publicis Groupe

133, avenue des Champs-Elysées, Paris, 75008, FR

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
800/1000Good

Founded in 1926 by Marcel Bleustein-Blanchet, today Publicis Groupe is one of the largest communications groups in the world and a leader in marketing, communication, and digital business transformation, led by Arthur Sadoun, the third CEO in its history. Publicis Gro...

NAICS:541613
NAICS Definition:Marketing Consulting Services
Employees:41,864
Subsidiaries:87
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company

YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Publicis Groupe

Publicis Groupe

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Publicis Groupe in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Publicis Groupe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Publicis Groupe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company

YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Publicis Groupe

Publicis Groupe

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company company and Publicis Groupe company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company company and Publicis Groupe company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company company and Publicis Groupe company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company company and Publicis Groupe company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company company and Publicis Groupe company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company company and Publicis Groupe company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company company and Publicis Groupe company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company company and Publicis Groupe company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company company and Publicis Groupe company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company company and Publicis Groupe company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company company and Publicis Groupe company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company and Publicis Groupe, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company and Publicis Groupe, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company or Publicis Groupe ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company or Publicis Groupe ?
Between YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company and Publicis Groupe, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between YuzuYello | an IPG Health Company and Publicis Groupe, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA