Comparison Overview
Yum! Brands

Yum! Brands
1441 Gardiner Lane, Louisville, KY, US, 40213
Last Update: 07/05/2026
Yum! Brands, Inc., based in Louisville, Kentucky, and its subsidiaries franchise or operate a system of over 62,000 restaurants in more than 155 countries and territories under the Company’s concepts – KFC, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut and Habit Burger & Grill. The Company's KF...

Jimmy John's
3 Glenlake Pkwy NE, Sandy Springs, Georgia, US, 30328
Last Update: 02/04/2026
THE SANDWICH OF SANDWICHES℠ At Jimmy John's, we don't make sandwiches. We make The Sandwich of Sandwiches℠. We use fresh vegetables because we don't hate salads, we just feel bad for them. We hand-slice our provolone cheese and meats in-house every day, because packag...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Yum! Brands







Jimmy John's






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
Yum! Brands has 61.83% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Jimmy John's in 2026.
Incident History - Yum! Brands (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Yum! Brands cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Jimmy John's (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Jimmy John's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Yum! Brands

Jimmy John's
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.