Comparison Overview

YPF

VS

Chevron

YPF

Macacha Guemes 515, Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, ., AR
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ypf.com

En YPF, tenemos un Plan 4x4 para convertirnos en una compañía de clase mundial y lograr transformarnos en grandes exportadores de hidrocarburos. Nuestros cuatro pilares son: la aceleración de la producción de petróleo en Vaca Muerta, el activo más importante que tiene nuestro país; la disciplina financiera en la gestión de inversiones; la búsqueda de las eficiencias operativas en los negocios, y la concreción del proyecto de GNL en Argentina. Invertimos en grandes proyectos de producción y exploración, transformación energética, industrialización y en el desarrollo de ductos para transportar la producción. Trabajamos por los combustibles del futuro y de calidad internacional. Buscamos constantemente innovación y nuevas tecnologías. Ponemos mucho esfuerzo para multiplicar nuestro potencial energético y seguir desarrollando la industria. Energía a la altura de tu energía. #YPFENERGÍAARGENTINA.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27,131
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Chevron

1400 Smith St, Houston, Texas, 77002, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 800 and 849
http://www.chevron.com

Our greatest resource is our people. Their ingenuity, creativity and collaboration have met the complex challenges of energy’s past. Together, we’ll take on the future. We support the LinkedIn Terms of Use (User Agreement), and we expect visitors to our page to do the same. We encourage open, lively conversation with a few simple rules: --We reserve the right to correct factual errors. --We will reply to comments when appropriate. --If we disagree with other opinions, we will do so respectfully. --You may not post anything that is spam or that is abusive, profane, or defamatory toward a person, entity, belief, or symbol. --We will delete any posts that contain personal information such as email addresses, phone numbers and physical addresses, and other third party intellectual property material, when that information does not belong to the author of the post. --You may not post job listings for non-Chevron positions. --While we support lively, open discussion, we reserve the right to delete comments.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 49,879
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ypf-s-a-.jpeg
YPF
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chevron.jpeg
Chevron
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
YPF
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chevron
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for YPF in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chevron in 2025.

Incident History — YPF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

YPF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chevron (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chevron cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ypf-s-a-.jpeg
YPF
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chevron.jpeg
Chevron
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Chevron company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to YPF company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Chevron company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to YPF company.

In the current year, Chevron company and YPF company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chevron company nor YPF company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chevron company nor YPF company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chevron company nor YPF company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither YPF company nor Chevron company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither YPF nor Chevron holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Chevron company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to YPF company.

Chevron company employs more people globally than YPF company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither YPF nor Chevron holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither YPF nor Chevron holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither YPF nor Chevron holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither YPF nor Chevron holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither YPF nor Chevron holds HIPAA certification.

Neither YPF nor Chevron holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References