YouTube A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
YouTube
Company Information
Website:http://www.youtube.com/jobs
Employees number:144,383
Number of followers:2,476,392
NAICS:513
Industry Type:Technology, Information and Internet
Homepage:youtube.com
YouTube Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
YouTubeTechnology, Information and Internet
Updated:
23/06/2026
23/06/2026
748/1000
Moderate
Ba
YouTube Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
YouTubeTechnology, Information and Internet
Score locked

YouTubeModerate
Current Score
748Ba (MODERATE)
01000
3 incidents
-7.5 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
750
JULY 2026
749
JUNE 2026
748
MAY 2026
745
APRIL 2026
745
MARCH 2026
742
FEBRUARY 2026
752
Cyber Attack
02 Feb 2026 • YouTube
YouTube, Discord, Google, MediaFire, Telegram, Facebook and TikTok: Arsink RAT Targets Android Devices To Steal Data and Enable Remote Control
Arsink: Android Malware Exploits Cloud Tools for Large-Scale Data Theft
740
CRITICAL-12
MEDZYPTELMETTIKGOOYOU1770029110
Arsink: Android Malware Exploits Cloud Tools for Large-Scale Data Theft
A sophisticated Android remote access trojan (RAT) dubbed Arsink has been uncovered, leveraging free cloud services to steal sensitive data and remotely control infected devices. Security firm Zimperium tracked the malware over several months, identifying 1,216 unique APK files, 317 Firebase command-and-control (C2) servers, and 45,000 victim IP addresses across 143 countries.
### Distribution & Deception
Hackers distributed Arsink through Telegram channels, Discord posts, and MediaFire links, disguising it as modified or "pro" versions of popular apps from over 50 brands, including Google, YouTube, WhatsApp, Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook. Once installed, the malware requests excessive permissions, hides its icon, and operates covertly offering no legitimate functionality while harvesting data.
### Four Attack Variants
Zimperium identified four primary Arsink variants, each using different cloud-based exfiltration methods:
1. Firebase + Google Apps Script – Small data (e.g., device info) is sent to Firebase Realtime Database, while larger files (photos, audio) are uploaded via Google Apps Script to Google Drive.
2. Telegram Exfiltration – SMS messages, call logs, and device details are transmitted directly to a hacker-controlled Telegram bot.
3. Embedded Dropper – A secondary payload is hidden within the app, extracted and renamed (e.g., Ai_App.zip to App.apk) without requiring internet downloads, evading detection.
4. Hybrid Cloud Abuse – Combines Firebase, Google Drive, and Telegram for data theft and command execution.
### Data Theft & Remote Control
Arsink captures a full device snapshot, including:
- Device details (model, battery, location, Google account emails)
- SMS messages (including one-time passcodes)
- Call logs & contacts
- Microphone recordings (stored in cloud storage)
- Photos & files (listed for potential upload)
Attackers can remotely:
- Toggle the flashlight, vibrate the phone, or play sounds
- Change wallpaper, display messages, or speak text via text-to-speech
- Initiate calls, manage files (upload, delete, wipe external storage)
- Hide the app icon and maintain persistence via fake foreground notifications
### Global Impact & Victim Distribution
The malware has infected users across the Middle East, Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Americas, with the highest concentrations in:
- Egypt (13,000 infections)
- Indonesia (7,000)
- Iraq & Yemen (3,000 each)
- Türkiye (2,000)
- Pakistan & India (2,500 each)
- Bangladesh (1,600)
- Algeria & Morocco (1,000 each)
India’s high infection rate correlates with frequent Telegram-based APK distribution.
### Mitigation & Response
Zimperium collaborated with Google to dismantle malicious Firebase endpoints, Apps Scripts, and accounts. Google Play Protect now blocks known Arsink samples outside the Play Store. However, attackers rapidly adapt, making behavior-based detection critical for enterprises, particularly as the malware targets work-related credentials via SMS interception.
Arsink’s use of legitimate cloud services for C2 operations highlights the growing challenge of detecting malware that blends into normal traffic.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
JANUARY 2026
754
Vulnerability
01 Jan 2026 • YouTube
YouTube and Google: Researcher Earns $148,337 for Google Cloud Production RCE Vulnerability
Google Cloud RCE Flaw Exploited via Internal API Misconfigurations
751
CRITICAL-3
YOUGOO1782210666
Google Cloud RCE Flaw Earns Researcher $148,337 in Bug Bounty Payout
Security researcher Arvin Shivram uncovered a critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in Google Cloud’s Application Integration service, earning a total of $148,337 through Google’s Vulnerability Reward Program (VRP). The flaw, tracked as CVE-2026-2031, carried a CVSS score of 10.0 and stemmed from an access control issue that allowed attackers to execute arbitrary code in Google’s production environment.
The exploit chain began when an automated fuzzing tool flagged an internal API (`cloudcrmipfrontend-pa.googleapis.com`) exposing debugging endpoints. Further investigation revealed an endpoint (`v1/integrationPlatform/getProtoDefinition`) that leaked protobuf descriptors for internal services, including YouTube and Google’s CRM stack. This provided attackers with near-complete visibility into Google’s internal API schemas, simplifying further exploitation.
A second endpoint (`listQuotaQueue`) leaked an internal workflow execution queue and a default `clientId`, enabling the creation of malicious draft workflows. The researcher then exploited GenericStubbyTypedTaskV2, a task type in Google’s Stubby RPC framework, to trigger arbitrary RPC calls with the integration platform’s privileged service identity. While workflow publishing required two-person approval, the researcher bypassed this by manipulating an internal ACL endpoint (`integrationPlatform/auth/setAcl`) to add attacker-controlled accounts as both requester and approver.
In collaboration with another researcher ("shrugged"), Shivram later discovered that Google’s initial fixes were only partially deployed, allowing the RCE chain to persist on unpatched backend instances. Three months later, a second RCE chain was identified, involving insecure direct object references (IDOR) and the "test cases" feature, which enabled cross-tenant access to workflow definitions, including those used by internal Google teams.
Google addressed the vulnerabilities by restricting internal endpoint access, patching IDOR weaknesses, and strengthening RPC security controls. The payouts included $60,000 for the first RCE chain, $75,000 for the second, and an additional $13,337 for a lingering privilege escalation issue. The incident highlights the risks of exposed internal APIs and misconfigured access controls in cloud environments.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
DECEMBER 2025
753
NOVEMBER 2025
752
OCTOBER 2025
750
SEPTEMBER 2025
749
MAY 2025
838
Breach
30 Apr 2025 • YouTube
Google and YouTube: Nearly 94 Billion Stolen Cookies Found on Dark Web
Widespread Data Exposure via Stolen Internet Cookies on Dark Web
742
CRITICAL-96
GOOYOU1766548552
Billions of Stolen Cookies Flood Dark Web, Exposing User Accounts and Personal Data
A recent investigation by NordVPN and threat exposure platform NordStellar has uncovered a massive trove of stolen internet cookies—approximately 93.7 billion—available for sale on dark web marketplaces. The analysis, conducted between April 23 and April 30, 2025, examined data from Telegram channels, revealing that 15.6 billion of these cookies were still active, posing an immediate security risk.
The stolen cookies contained sensitive data, including user IDs (18 billion), session tokens (1.2 billion), names, email addresses, locations, and even passwords. Session cookies, in particular, allow attackers to hijack active user sessions, granting unauthorized access to accounts without requiring passwords. The compromised data also enables targeted phishing attacks and identity theft.
The majority of stolen cookies originated from major platforms, with Google services accounting for over 4.5 billion, followed by YouTube and Microsoft (each over 1 billion). The primary theft method involved malware, particularly infostealers like Redline, which was responsible for stealing nearly 42 billion cookies.
The findings highlight the growing threat of cookie-based attacks, where seemingly harmless browser files become tools for cybercriminals to exploit personal and corporate security.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for YouTube ??
What was YouTube's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ??
What was YouTube's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ??
What was YouTube's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was YouTube's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was YouTube's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was YouTube's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was YouTube's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was YouTube's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was YouTube's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was YouTube's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was YouTube's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on YouTube's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with YouTube ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view YouTube's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?