Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Young & RubicamYoung & Rubicam
VS
dentsudentsu
Young & Rubicam

Young & Rubicam

3 Columbus Circle, New York, NY, 10019, US

Last Update: 30/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.yr.com
765/1000Fair

Y&R is a leading global marketing communications company, with more than 189 offices in 90+ countries. Our job is to Resist the Usual – the mission Y&R was founded on in 1923. We operate as a global boutique; our agencies have the authenticity of their local markets a...

NAICS:541613
NAICS Definition:Marketing Consulting Services
Employees:1,932
Subsidiaries:153
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
dentsu

dentsu

1-8-1 Higashi-shimbashi, Tokyo, JP

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://bit.ly/3lDa6Ff
684/1000Weak

We are dentsu. We team together to help brands predict and plan for disruptive future opportunities and create new paths to growth in the sustainable economy. We know people better than anyone else and we use those insights to connect brand, content, commerce and experi...

NAICS:541613
NAICS Definition:Marketing Consulting Services
Employees:19,113
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Young & Rubicam

Young & Rubicam

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
dentsu

dentsu

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Young & Rubicam in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for dentsu in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Young & Rubicam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Young & Rubicam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - dentsu (X = Date, Y = Severity)

dentsu cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Young & Rubicam

Young & Rubicam

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
dentsu

dentsu

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEN1492114110225
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEN0962609112125

FAQ

Between Young & Rubicam company and dentsu company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and dentsu company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and dentsu company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and dentsu company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and dentsu company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and dentsu company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and dentsu company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and dentsu company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and dentsu company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and dentsu company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and dentsu company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Young & Rubicam and dentsu, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Young & Rubicam and dentsu, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Young & Rubicam or dentsu ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Young & Rubicam or dentsu ?
Between Young & Rubicam and dentsu, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Young & Rubicam and dentsu, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
Young-&-rubicam vs Dentsu - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating | Rankiteo