Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Young & RubicamYoung & Rubicam
VS
QuadQuad
Young & Rubicam

Young & Rubicam

3 Columbus Circle, New York, NY, 10019, US

Last Update: 30/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.yr.com
765/1000Fair

Y&R is a leading global marketing communications company, with more than 189 offices in 90+ countries. Our job is to Resist the Usual – the mission Y&R was founded on in 1923. We operate as a global boutique; our agencies have the authenticity of their local markets a...

NAICS:541613
NAICS Definition:Marketing Consulting Services
Employees:1,932
Subsidiaries:153
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Quad

Quad

Sussex, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.quad.com
750/1000Fair

Quad (NYSE: QUAD) is a global marketing experience company that helps brands make direct consumer connections, from household to in-store to online. Supported by state-of-the-art technology and data-driven intelligence, Quad uses its suite of media, creative and product...

NAICS:541613
NAICS Definition:Marketing Consulting Services
Employees:10,259
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Young & Rubicam

Young & Rubicam

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Quad

Quad

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Young & Rubicam in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quad in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Young & Rubicam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Young & Rubicam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Quad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Young & Rubicam

Young & Rubicam

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Quad

Quad

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Young & Rubicam company and Quad company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and Quad company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and Quad company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and Quad company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and Quad company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and Quad company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and Quad company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and Quad company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and Quad company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and Quad company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Young & Rubicam company and Quad company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Young & Rubicam and Quad, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Young & Rubicam and Quad, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Young & Rubicam or Quad ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Young & Rubicam or Quad ?
Between Young & Rubicam and Quad, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Young & Rubicam and Quad, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57990
SUMMARY

Files or directories accessible to external parties in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57989
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57978
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-17497
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 grants the Tauri shell plugin shell:allow-execute capability for bash, python, and python3 with arbitrary arguments in the default desktop capabilities. JavaScript running in the application webview can therefore invoke plugin:shell|execute to run attacker-controlled operating system commands with the privileges of the NoteGen process. In combination with script execution in the webview (for example via chat XSS), this enables full remote code execution on the user's machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-17496
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 renders AI chat responses with markdown-it configured with html:true and injects the result into the DOM via dangerouslySetInnerHTML in chat-preview, without HTML sanitization and with CSP set to null. Attacker-controlled content that reaches the model prompt (for example a malicious skill REFERENCE.md that instructs the model to emit HTML) can cause the model response to include executable markup such as an img onerror handler. When the user views the chat response, that markup runs as JavaScript in the privileged Tauri webview, enabling arbitrary script execution in the application context (cross-site scripting).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8