Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Yotta DrishticamYotta Drishticam
VS
AkkodisAkkodis
Yotta Drishticam

Yotta Drishticam

Mumbai , 400076, IN

Last Update: 15/07/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://drishticam.ai/
751/1000Fair

Drishticam: AI-Powered Cloud-Based Smart Surveillance Security Platform-as-a-Service. Drishticam, an advanced AI-powered, cloud-based surveillance and video management service platform. Built on the robust multi-tenant VSaaS (Video Surveillance as a Service) software...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Akkodis

Akkodis

N/A

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.akkodis.com
813/1000Good

Akkodis is a global digital engineering company and Smart Industry leader. We enable clients to advance in their digital transformation with Talent, Academy, Consulting, and Solutions services. Our 50,000 experts combine best-in-class technologies, R&D, and deep sector ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:25,035
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Yotta Drishticam

Yotta Drishticam

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Akkodis

Akkodis

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yotta Drishticam in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Akkodis in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Yotta Drishticam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yotta Drishticam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Akkodis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Akkodis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Yotta Drishticam

Yotta Drishticam

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Akkodis

Akkodis

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Yotta Drishticam company and Akkodis company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Yotta Drishticam company and Akkodis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Yotta Drishticam company and Akkodis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Yotta Drishticam company and Akkodis company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Yotta Drishticam company and Akkodis company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Yotta Drishticam company and Akkodis company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Yotta Drishticam company and Akkodis company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Yotta Drishticam company and Akkodis company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Yotta Drishticam company and Akkodis company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Yotta Drishticam company and Akkodis company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Yotta Drishticam company and Akkodis company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Yotta Drishticam and Akkodis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Yotta Drishticam and Akkodis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Yotta Drishticam or Akkodis ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Yotta Drishticam or Akkodis ?
Between Yotta Drishticam and Akkodis, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Yotta Drishticam and Akkodis, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3