Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

YoSmart/YoLinkYoSmart/YoLink
VS
GarminGarmin
YoSmart/YoLink

YoSmart/YoLink

25172 Arctic Ocean Dr, Lake Forest, 92630, US

Last Update: 27/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.yosmart.com
748/1000Moderate

YoLink, by YoSmart, a US corporation based in Irvine, California, is a line of wireless smart products for residential and commercial use, utilizing wireless technology initially utilized for industrial and other large-scale applications. This technology, LoRa, short f...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Garmin

Garmin

1200 E. 151st Street, Olathe, KS, US, 66062

Last Update: 27/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.garmin.com
782/1000Fair

WHERE DO WE START? How about Kansas City? That’s our home. That’s where Garmin put a stake in the ground in 1989. We’ve grown substantially over the years, offering diverse products and global reach in 5 diverse markets. But some things won’t ever change: Our entreprene...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:10,828
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
YoSmart/YoLink

YoSmart/YoLink

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Garmin

Garmin

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

YoSmart/YoLink has 52.38% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Garmin has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - YoSmart/YoLink (X = Date, Y = Severity)

YoSmart/YoLink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Garmin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Garmin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
YoSmart/YoLink

YoSmart/YoLink

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GURROCYOS1768400893
Garmin

Garmin

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GAR1777306152
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
GAR201521222

FAQ

Between YoSmart/YoLink company and Garmin company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between YoSmart/YoLink company and Garmin company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between YoSmart/YoLink company and Garmin company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between YoSmart/YoLink company and Garmin company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between YoSmart/YoLink company and Garmin company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between YoSmart/YoLink company and Garmin company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between YoSmart/YoLink company and Garmin company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between YoSmart/YoLink company and Garmin company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between YoSmart/YoLink company and Garmin company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between YoSmart/YoLink company and Garmin company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between YoSmart/YoLink company and Garmin company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between YoSmart/YoLink and Garmin, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between YoSmart/YoLink and Garmin, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - YoSmart/YoLink or Garmin ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - YoSmart/YoLink or Garmin ?
Between YoSmart/YoLink and Garmin, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between YoSmart/YoLink and Garmin, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA