Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Yosemite Community College DistrictYosemite Community College District
VS
York UniversityYork University
Yosemite Community College District

Yosemite Community College District

Yosemite Community College District, P.O. Box 4065, Modesto, California, US, 95352

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.yosemite.edu
729/1000Moderate

The Yosemite Community College District (YCCD) is among the oldest community college districts in California and includes two comprehensive, two-year colleges (Columbia College and Modesto Junior College) and a Central Services unit that provides shared administrative a...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:247
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
York University

York University

4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Toronto, on, CA, M3J 1P3

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://yorku.ca/
798/1000Fair

York University is a diverse community of students, faculty, and staff driving positive change. As one of the largest post-secondary communities in the world and with a uniquely global perspective, we are driven by passion and purpose as part of a forward-thinking co...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:11,129
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Yosemite Community College District

Yosemite Community College District

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
York University

York University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yosemite Community College District in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for York University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Yosemite Community College District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yosemite Community College District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - York University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

York University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Yosemite Community College District

Yosemite Community College District

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
YOS342091725
York University

York University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
YOR1430301222

FAQ

Between Yosemite Community College District company and York University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Yosemite Community College District company and York University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Yosemite Community College District company and York University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Yosemite Community College District company and York University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Yosemite Community College District company and York University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Yosemite Community College District company and York University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Yosemite Community College District company and York University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Yosemite Community College District company and York University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Yosemite Community College District company and York University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Yosemite Community College District company and York University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Yosemite Community College District company and York University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Yosemite Community College District and York University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Yosemite Community College District and York University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Yosemite Community College District or York University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Yosemite Community College District or York University ?
Between Yosemite Community College District and York University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Yosemite Community College District and York University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2