Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Yıldız TechYıldız Tech
VS
Carelon Global Solutions IndiaCarelon Global Solutions India
Yıldız Tech

Yıldız Tech

Ferah Caddesi, Kısıklı, 34692, TR

Last Update: 15/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://yildiz.ventures
752/1000Fair

Grup bünyemizdeki dijital uygulamalarımızın yazılım geliştirme yolculuklarına destek olmak ve yenilikçi çözümler üretmek üzere hayata geçirdiğimiz Yıldız Tech şirketimiz, özellikle e-ticaret alanında faaliyet gösteren müşterilerimizin, yeni nesil teknolojilerden en iyi ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:145
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Carelon Global Solutions India

Carelon Global Solutions India

Indianapolis, Indianapolis, 46204, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.carelonglobal.in
779/1000Fair

Carelon Global Solutions makes healthcare operations more practical, effective, and efficient. Our global team of more than 25K innovators drives growth, delivers exceptional support, and develops digital tools specifically for health plans, providers, and systems. Each...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:14,598
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Yıldız Tech

Yıldız Tech

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Carelon Global Solutions India

Carelon Global Solutions India

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yıldız Tech in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carelon Global Solutions India in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Yıldız Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yıldız Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Carelon Global Solutions India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carelon Global Solutions India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Yıldız Tech

Yıldız Tech

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Carelon Global Solutions India

Carelon Global Solutions India

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Yıldız Tech company and Carelon Global Solutions India company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Yıldız Tech company and Carelon Global Solutions India company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Yıldız Tech company and Carelon Global Solutions India company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Yıldız Tech company and Carelon Global Solutions India company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Yıldız Tech company and Carelon Global Solutions India company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Yıldız Tech company and Carelon Global Solutions India company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Yıldız Tech company and Carelon Global Solutions India company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Yıldız Tech company and Carelon Global Solutions India company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Yıldız Tech company and Carelon Global Solutions India company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Yıldız Tech company and Carelon Global Solutions India company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Yıldız Tech company and Carelon Global Solutions India company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Yıldız Tech and Carelon Global Solutions India, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Yıldız Tech and Carelon Global Solutions India, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Yıldız Tech or Carelon Global Solutions India ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Yıldız Tech or Carelon Global Solutions India ?
Between Yıldız Tech and Carelon Global Solutions India, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Yıldız Tech and Carelon Global Solutions India, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA