Comparison Overview
YES BANK

YES BANK
13-103 Western Express Highway, Anand Nagar, Vakola, Santacruz East , Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN
Last Update: 01/04/2026
YES BANK is a leading Indian private sector bank committed to transforming the financial landscape of India. With over 1200 branches nationwide and a dedicated team of YES BANKers, we strive to deliver exceptional banking solutions and empower individuals, businesses an...

AIB
AIB Group , Molesworth Street , Dublin 2, IE, 2
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We're here to keep you updated on AIB Group news, financial services industry insights, expert business reports and all the latest AIB career opportunities. We are one of Ireland’s major retail banks serving personal, business and corporate customers. We offer a range...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

YES BANK







AIB






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
YES BANK has 45.95% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AIB in 2026.
Incident History - YES BANK (X = Date, Y = Severity)
YES BANK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - AIB (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AIB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

YES BANK

AIB
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.