Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Yellow Hat LimitedYellow Hat Limited
VS
JacobsJacobs
Yellow Hat Limited

Yellow Hat Limited

Caterpillar Corner, Little Chesterford, CM10 1UD, GB

Last Update: 01/05/2026

View Profile
650/1000Weak

Yellow Hat drives people and organisational performance through effective communication and employee reward programmes. We work with large and small private sector businesses, high profile government departments, publicly funded organisations and not-for-profit companie...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Jacobs

Jacobs

1999 Bryan Street, Suite 1200, Dallas, 75201, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jacobs.com
787/1000Fair

At Jacobs, we're challenging today to reinvent tomorrow – delivering outcomes and solutions for the world's most complex challenges. With a team of approximately 45,000, we provide end-to-end services in advanced manufacturing, cities & places, energy, environmental, li...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:67,760
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Yellow Hat Limited

Yellow Hat Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Jacobs

Jacobs

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Yellow Hat Limited has 22.48% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jacobs in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Yellow Hat Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yellow Hat Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Jacobs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jacobs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Yellow Hat Limited

Yellow Hat Limited

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
YEL1777624108
Jacobs

Jacobs

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Yellow Hat Limited company and Jacobs company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Yellow Hat Limited company and Jacobs company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Yellow Hat Limited company and Jacobs company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Yellow Hat Limited company and Jacobs company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Yellow Hat Limited company and Jacobs company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Yellow Hat Limited company and Jacobs company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Yellow Hat Limited company and Jacobs company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Yellow Hat Limited company and Jacobs company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Yellow Hat Limited company and Jacobs company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Yellow Hat Limited company and Jacobs company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Yellow Hat Limited company and Jacobs company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Yellow Hat Limited and Jacobs, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Yellow Hat Limited and Jacobs, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Yellow Hat Limited or Jacobs ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Yellow Hat Limited or Jacobs ?
Between Yellow Hat Limited and Jacobs, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Yellow Hat Limited and Jacobs, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59858
SUMMARY

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0735, the C omni-completion script in runtime/autoload/ccomplete.vim interpolates the typeref: or typename: extension field of a tags entry, without escaping, into a :vimgrep pattern that is run through :execute. Because :vimgrep honors the bar as a command separator, a crafted tag field can close the search pattern and append an arbitrary Ex command; opening a hostile .c file whose project tags file contains such an entry and invoking C omni-completion runs that command as the editing user. This issue is fixed in version 9.2.0735.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59857
SUMMARY

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0725, the single-byte branch of spell_soundfold_sal() in src/spell.c translates a word through a spell file's SAL sound-folding rules into a caller-owned result buffer, but its result writes are guarded with reslen < MAXWLEN, allowing reslen to reach MAXWLEN before res[reslen] = NUL writes one byte past the end of the MAXWLEN-element stack buffer. A boundary-length word passed to soundfold(), or reached via sound-based spell suggestion while a SAL-based spell language is active under a non-multibyte 8-bit encoding, can corrupt the eval_soundfold() stack frame and crash the editor. This issue is fixed in version 9.2.0725.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59856
SUMMARY

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0736, the PHP omni-completion script in runtime/autoload/phpcomplete.vim interpolates a class or trait name, taken from the contents of the edited buffer, into a search() pattern that is run via win_execute() without escaping. A name containing a single quote can terminate the search() string argument early, and because the bar is honored as an Ex command separator, the remainder of the name is run as Ex commands; via the :! command this allows arbitrary operating-system command execution when a victim opens a crafted PHP file and invokes omni-completion. This issue is fixed in version 9.2.0736.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59855
SUMMARY

SiYuan is an open-source personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.7.1, Asset.render in app/src/asset/index.ts interpolates the unsanitized this.path value into HTML assigned to innerHTML, allowing a crafted asset link containing a double quote to break out of the src attribute, inject an event handler, and execute JavaScript that can run OS commands in the Electron renderer. This issue is fixed in versions 3.7.1-alpha.2 and 3.7.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59854
SUMMARY

SiYuan is an open-source personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.7.1, POST /api/file/globalCopyFiles accepts attacker-supplied absolute source paths and relies on util.IsSensitivePath in kernel/util/path.go, whose denylist misses common home-directory credential files such as .git-credentials, .netrc, .pgpass, .kube/config, .docker/config.json, and .gnupg, allowing an authenticated administrator or API-token user to copy those files into the workspace and exfiltrate them through the file API. This issue is fixed in versions 3.7.1-alpha.2 and 3.7.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2