Yaraguatemala vs Sika - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

Comparison Overview

Yara Guatemala

Sika

Yara Guatemala

Calzada Roosevelth 33 - 86 zona 7 Edificio Ilumina Nivel 11 - Oficina 1102 , Guatemala, Guatemala, 01007, GT

Last Update: 19/04/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

http://www,yara.com.gt

752/1000Fair

El conocimiento y la experiencia de Yara, sus productos y soluciones, hacen crecer la rentabilidad del negocio de agricultores, distribuidores y clientes industriales en manera responsable, a la vez cuidando y protegiendo los recursos del planeta, su productividad y el ...

NAICS:325

NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing

Employees:37

Subsidiaries:29

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Sika

Zugerstrasse 50, Baar, Zug, CH, 6341

Last Update: 20/09/2026

View Profile

Between 800 and 849

https://www.sika.com/

806/1000Good

Sika is a specialty chemicals company with a globally leading position in the development and production of systems and products for bonding, sealing, damping, reinforcing, and protection in the building sector and industrial manufacturing. Sika has subsidiaries in 102 ...

NAICS:325

NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing

Employees:19,107

Subsidiaries:4

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

Yara Guatemala

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Sika

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yara Guatemala in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sika in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Yara Guatemala (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yara Guatemala cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sika (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sika cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

Yara Guatemala

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

Sika

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Yara Guatemala company and Sika company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Yara Guatemala company and Sika company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Yara Guatemala company and Sika company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Yara Guatemala company and Sika company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Yara Guatemala company and Sika company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Yara Guatemala company and Sika company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Yara Guatemala company and Sika company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Yara Guatemala company and Sika company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Yara Guatemala company and Sika company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Yara Guatemala company and Sika company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Yara Guatemala company and Sika company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Yara Guatemala and Sika, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Yara Guatemala and Sika, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Yara Guatemala or Sika ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Yara Guatemala or Sika ?

Between Yara Guatemala and Sika, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Yara Guatemala and Sika, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451

SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

5.9

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/ultimate-member/vulnerability/wordpress-ultimate-member-plugin-2-13-1-privilege-escalation-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-103342

SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

3.7

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/unlimited-elements-for-elementor/vulnerability/wordpress-unlimited-elements-for-elementor-free-widgets-addons-templates-plugin-2-0-20-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-103065

SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

IMPACT SCORE

4.2

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/kirki/vulnerability/wordpress-kirki-plugin-6-3-1-arbitrary-code-execution-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-105122

SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)

CVSS3

Base Score: 5.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

CVSS4

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

2.5

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-105121

SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVSS4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

1.2

REFERENCES