Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş.Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş.
VS
COTOCOTO
Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş.

Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş.

Subaşı Mahallesi, İzmir , TR

Last Update: 01/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.yanmar.com/tr/
754/1000Fair

Yanmar Turkey, 100 yılı aşkın deneyime sahip Japon markası Yanmar'ın Türkiye yapılanmasıdır. 2017 yılında İzmir’de faaliyetlerine başlayan Yanmar Turkey; tarım makineleri, iş makineleri ve endüstriyel motorlar alanlarında müşteri beklentilerini aşarak çevreci çözümler ...

NAICS:522293
NAICS Definition:International Trade Financing
Employees:145
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
COTO

COTO

Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, AR

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
800/1000Good

¿Sabés lo importante que es para nosotros que formes parte de COTO? Te proponemos superarte con proyectos arquitectónicos increíbles como, por ejemplo, la construcción de un mega centro comercial, o profesionalizarte en Comercio Exterior interactuando con los mercados ...

NAICS:522293
NAICS Definition:International Trade Financing
Employees:18,260
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş.

Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
COTO

COTO

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs International Trade and Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs International Trade and Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for COTO in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - COTO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

COTO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş.

Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
COTO

COTO

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. company and COTO company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. company and COTO company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. company and COTO company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. company and COTO company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. company and COTO company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. company and COTO company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. company and COTO company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. company and COTO company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. company and COTO company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. company and COTO company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. company and COTO company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. and COTO, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. and COTO, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. or COTO ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. or COTO ?
Between Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. and COTO, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Yanmar Turkey Makine A.Ş. and COTO, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57100
SUMMARY

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Entra Provisioning Service (SyncFabric) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-54998
SUMMARY

Incorrect authorization in Microsoft Exchange Online allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-45499
SUMMARY

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure OpenAI allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-41106
SUMMARY

Url redirection to untrusted site ('open redirect') in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-26145
SUMMARY

Improper access control in Azure Synapse allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2