Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

YanmarYanmar
VS
SulzerSulzer
Yanmar

Yanmar

1-32 Chayamachi, Osaka, 543-0062, JP

Last Update: 01/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.yanmar.com
753/1000Fair

Founded in Osaka, Japan in 1912, Yanmar was the first ever to succeed in making a compact diesel engine of a practical size in 1933. A pioneer in diesel engine technology, Yanmar is a global innovator in a wide range of industrial equipment, from small and large engines...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:2,088
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sulzer

Sulzer

Neuwiesenstrasse 15, Winterthur, 8401, CH

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.sulzer.com
767/1000Fair

Sulzer is a global leader in critical applications for core infrastructure and processes for large essential industries around the world. We ensure the security, quality and durability of critical goods and services by supporting energy security, natural resource manage...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:10,639
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Yanmar

Yanmar

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sulzer

Sulzer

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yanmar in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sulzer in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Yanmar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yanmar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sulzer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sulzer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Yanmar

Yanmar

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sulzer

Sulzer

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Yanmar company and Sulzer company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Yanmar company and Sulzer company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Yanmar company and Sulzer company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Yanmar company and Sulzer company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Yanmar company and Sulzer company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Yanmar company and Sulzer company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Yanmar company and Sulzer company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Yanmar company and Sulzer company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Yanmar company and Sulzer company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Yanmar company and Sulzer company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Yanmar company and Sulzer company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Yanmar and Sulzer, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Yanmar and Sulzer, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Yanmar or Sulzer ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Yanmar or Sulzer ?
Between Yanmar and Sulzer, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Yanmar and Sulzer, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-14683
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in HdrHistogram up to 2.2.2. Affected by this issue is the function org.HdrHistogram.AbstractHistogram.decodeFromCompressedByteBuffer of the file src/main/java/org/HdrHistogram/AbstractHistogram.java. The manipulation of the argument lengthOfCompressedContents results in uncontrolled memory allocation. The attack needs to be approached locally. The exploit is now public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 1.7
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-14660
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in code-projects Online Job Portal 1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file login.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument txtUser/txtPass results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-14659
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /patientappointment.php. Such manipulation of the argument patiente leads to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-14658
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in code-projects Assessment Management 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /lecturer/marking-scheme.php. The manipulation of the argument smarksrange[] results in sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-14657
SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in code-projects Assessment Management 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /lecturer/marking-scheme.php of the component Database Query Handler. This manipulation of the argument squestions[] causes sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8