Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

YANMAR EuropeYANMAR Europe
VS
SKF GroupSKF Group
YANMAR Europe

YANMAR Europe

Brugplein 11, Almere, Flevoland, NL, 1332 BS

Last Update: 11/11/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.yanmar.com/eu
745/1000Moderate

Yanmar Europe B.V. is a subsidiary of Yanmar Co Ltd. Our office in Almere, the Netherlands, serves as the Regional headquarters for Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) and is responsible for all business activities across five broad sectors: marine, energy system...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:136
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SKF Group

SKF Group

Sven Wingquist Gata 2, Göteborg, SE-415 50, SE

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.skf.com
787/1000Fair

We fight friction to move the world forward. 20% of all energy consumed is spent overcoming friction. At SKF, we’re constantly fighting that friction, to reduce energy waste and make the most of the resources we have. Since 1907, we’ve been making some of the world’...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:20,298
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
YANMAR Europe

YANMAR Europe

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SKF Group

SKF Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for YANMAR Europe in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SKF Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - YANMAR Europe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

YANMAR Europe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SKF Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SKF Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
YANMAR Europe

YANMAR Europe

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SKF Group

SKF Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between YANMAR Europe company and SKF Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between YANMAR Europe company and SKF Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between YANMAR Europe company and SKF Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between YANMAR Europe company and SKF Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between YANMAR Europe company and SKF Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between YANMAR Europe company and SKF Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between YANMAR Europe company and SKF Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between YANMAR Europe company and SKF Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between YANMAR Europe company and SKF Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between YANMAR Europe company and SKF Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between YANMAR Europe company and SKF Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between YANMAR Europe and SKF Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between YANMAR Europe and SKF Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - YANMAR Europe or SKF Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - YANMAR Europe or SKF Group ?
Between YANMAR Europe and SKF Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between YANMAR Europe and SKF Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2