Comparison Overview
Yale University
Yale University
Woodbridge Hall, New Haven, CT, US, 6520
Last Update: 08/05/2026
For more than 300 years, Yale University has inspired the minds that inspire the world. Based in New Haven, Connecticut, Yale brings people and ideas together for positive impact around the globe. A research university that focuses on students and encourages learning as...
University of Utah
201 Presidents Circle, ROOM 203, Address 2, Salt Lake City, ut, US, 84112-9008
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The University of Utah, located in Salt Lake City in the foothills of the Wasatch Mountains, is the flagship institution of higher learning in Utah. Founded in 1850, it serves over 31,000 students from across the U.S. and the world. With over 72 major subjects at the un...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Yale University
University of Utah
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
Yale University has 44.75% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Utah in 2026.
Incident History - Yale University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Yale University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - University of Utah (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Utah cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Yale University
University of Utah
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in ealpha072 Student-Management-System up to 01451bd7a2f58cdda07bd0b86e3967582e3ecd08. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file admin/config.php of the component Administrative Backend. Such manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A vulnerability was determined in sgl-project SGLang up to 0.5.11. Affected by this vulnerability is the function data_hash of the component Cache Handler. This manipulation causes denial of service. The attack is restricted to local execution. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
Active IQ OneCollect version 2.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
Active IQ Config Advisor version 6.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
A vulnerability was found in crmeb crmeb_java 1.4. Affected is the function RestTemplate.getForEntity of the file crmeb-common/src/main/java/com/zbkj/common/utils/RestTemplateUtil.java of the component base64 Qrcode Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.