Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Xylem Water Solutions NetherlandsXylem Water Solutions Netherlands
VS
FLSmidthFLSmidth
Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands

Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands

Pieter Zeemanweg 240, Dordrecht, undefined, 3316 GZ, NL

Last Update: 18/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.xylem.com/nl-nl
746/1000Moderate

In the Netherlands, 170employees work for Xylem. With this skilled and experienced team, we take on water challenges every day. With brands such as Flygt, Emnet, Godwin, Leopold, Pure, Sanitaire and Wedeco, we offer solutions within the entire cycle of water. We can pro...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:276
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
FLSmidth

FLSmidth

Vigerslev Allé 77, Copenhagen, Valby, DK, DK-2500

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fls.com
760/1000Fair

FLSmidth is a full flowsheet technology and service supplier to the global mining industry. We enable our customers to improve performance, lower operating costs and reduce environmental impact. MissionZero is our sustainability ambition towards zero emissions in mining...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:13,187
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands

Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
FLSmidth

FLSmidth

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FLSmidth in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - FLSmidth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FLSmidth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands

Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
FLSmidth

FLSmidth

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands company and FLSmidth company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands company and FLSmidth company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands company and FLSmidth company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands company and FLSmidth company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands company and FLSmidth company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands and FLSmidth, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands and FLSmidth, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands or FLSmidth ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands or FLSmidth ?
Between Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands and FLSmidth, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Xylem Water Solutions Netherlands and FLSmidth, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1