Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

XTIUMXTIUM
VS
AmadeusAmadeus
XTIUM

XTIUM

New York, NY, US, 10119

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.xtium.com
641/1000Poor

XTIUM, created through the business combination of ATSG and Evolve IP, delivers a modern security-first approach to the managed IT services experience. Leveraging AI innovations, enterprise-grade cybersecurity, virtual desktops, unified communications, and more, XTIUM a...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:460
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Amadeus

Amadeus

C/Salvador de Madariaga 1, Madrid, 28027, ES

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://amadeus.com
787/1000Fair

We make the experience of travel better for everyone, everywhere by inspiring innovation, partnerships and responsibility to people, places and planet. Our technology powers the travel and tourism industry. We inspire more connected ways of thinking, centered around ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:23,419
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
XTIUM

XTIUM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Amadeus

Amadeus

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

XTIUM has 33.33% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amadeus in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - XTIUM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

XTIUM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Amadeus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amadeus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
XTIUM

XTIUM

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
XTI1775334517
🔒 Incident : Breach
XTI556080425
Amadeus

Amadeus

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AMA5502055092125

FAQ

Between XTIUM company and Amadeus company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between XTIUM company and Amadeus company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between XTIUM company and Amadeus company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between XTIUM company and Amadeus company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between XTIUM company and Amadeus company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between XTIUM company and Amadeus company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between XTIUM company and Amadeus company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between XTIUM company and Amadeus company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between XTIUM company and Amadeus company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between XTIUM company and Amadeus company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between XTIUM company and Amadeus company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between XTIUM and Amadeus, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between XTIUM and Amadeus, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - XTIUM or Amadeus ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - XTIUM or Amadeus ?
Between XTIUM and Amadeus, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between XTIUM and Amadeus, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1