Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel)Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel)
VS
Norsk HydroNorsk Hydro
Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel)

Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel)

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, CA

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.glencore.com
759/1000Fair

Glencore is one of the world’s largest global diversified natural resource companies and is one of the biggest companies within the FTSE 100 Index. The Group’s industrial and marketing activities are supported by a global network of more than 90 offices located in over ...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:554
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Norsk Hydro

Norsk Hydro

Drammensveien 264, Oslo, Oslo, NO, 0283

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.hydro.com
658/1000Weak

Hydro is a leading industrial company that builds businesses and partnerships for a more sustainable future. We develop industries that matter to people and society. Since 1905, Hydro has turned natural resources into valuable products for people and businesses, creati...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:13,095
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel)

Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Norsk Hydro

Norsk Hydro

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Norsk Hydro in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Norsk Hydro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Norsk Hydro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel)

Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Norsk Hydro

Norsk Hydro

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NOR442050724
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NOR416051424
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NOR5602456091025

FAQ

Between Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) company and Norsk Hydro company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) company and Norsk Hydro company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) and Norsk Hydro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) and Norsk Hydro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) or Norsk Hydro ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) or Norsk Hydro ?
Between Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) and Norsk Hydro, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Glencore (formerly Xstrata Nickel) and Norsk Hydro, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8