Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港
VS
Delivery HeroDelivery Hero
XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港

XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港

Hong Kong Science and Technology Park., Hong Kong, HK

Last Update: 15/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.xoocity.com
796/1000Fair

XOOCITY is pioneering a virtual metaverse named CitiFi, designed to seamlessly integrate trade, tourism, job opportunities, and social interactions. By harnessing the power of blockchain technology and real-world assets, we have created a platform for trading virtual as...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:74
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Delivery Hero

Delivery Hero

Oranienburger Straße 70, Berlin, Berlin, DE, 10117

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.deliveryhero.com
786/1000Fair

As the world’s leading local delivery platform, our mission is to deliver an amazing experience, fast, easy, and to your door. We operate in over 70+ countries worldwide, powered by tech but driven by people. As one of Europe’s largest tech platforms, we enable ambitiou...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:40,211
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港

XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Delivery Hero

Delivery Hero

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Delivery Hero in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Delivery Hero (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Delivery Hero cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港

XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Delivery Hero

Delivery Hero

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 company and Delivery Hero company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 company and Delivery Hero company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 company and Delivery Hero company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 company and Delivery Hero company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 company and Delivery Hero company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 company and Delivery Hero company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 company and Delivery Hero company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 company and Delivery Hero company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 company and Delivery Hero company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 company and Delivery Hero company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 company and Delivery Hero company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 and Delivery Hero, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 and Delivery Hero, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 or Delivery Hero ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 or Delivery Hero ?
Between XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 and Delivery Hero, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between XOOCITY Hong Kong Metaverse 数宇城香港 and Delivery Hero, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9044
SUMMARY

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54909
SUMMARY

pion/stun is a Go implementation of STUN. Prior to 3.1.3, XORMappedAddress.GetFromAs can panic while parsing a malformed short XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS attribute in STUN or ICE Binding-response parsing paths, allowing remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54785
SUMMARY

gemini-bridge is a lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via the official CLI. From 1.0.0 until 1.3.1, consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-54768
SUMMARY

WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53573
SUMMARY

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA