Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

XDNA - A Downer CompanyXDNA - A Downer Company
VS
Boston Consulting Group (BCG)Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
XDNA - A Downer Company

XDNA - A Downer Company

39 Delhi Rd, North Ryde, 2113, AU

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://xdna.com.au
750/1000Fair

xDNA, established in 2016 and trading under its current name since 2023, is Downer's technology business. Specialising in advanced technology solutions for critical infrastructure industries such as utilities, energy, rail, defence, mining, and transport, xDNA operates...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:24
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Boston Consulting Group (BCG)

Boston Consulting Group (BCG)

200 Pier 4 Blvd, Boston, Massachusetts, US, 02210

Last Update: 19/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bcg.com
789/1000Fair

Boston Consulting Group partners with leaders in business and society to tackle their most important challenges and capture their greatest opportunities. BCG was the pioneer in business strategy when it was founded in 1963. Today, we work closely with clients to embrace...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:40,418
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
XDNA - A Downer Company

XDNA - A Downer Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Boston Consulting Group (BCG)

Boston Consulting Group (BCG)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for XDNA - A Downer Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Boston Consulting Group (BCG) has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - XDNA - A Downer Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

XDNA - A Downer Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Boston Consulting Group (BCG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boston Consulting Group (BCG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
XDNA - A Downer Company

XDNA - A Downer Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Boston Consulting Group (BCG)

Boston Consulting Group (BCG)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BAIBOS1776126313

FAQ

Between XDNA - A Downer Company company and Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between XDNA - A Downer Company company and Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between XDNA - A Downer Company company and Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between XDNA - A Downer Company company and Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between XDNA - A Downer Company company and Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between XDNA - A Downer Company company and Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between XDNA - A Downer Company company and Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between XDNA - A Downer Company company and Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between XDNA - A Downer Company company and Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between XDNA - A Downer Company company and Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between XDNA - A Downer Company company and Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between XDNA - A Downer Company and Boston Consulting Group (BCG), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between XDNA - A Downer Company and Boston Consulting Group (BCG), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - XDNA - A Downer Company or Boston Consulting Group (BCG) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - XDNA - A Downer Company or Boston Consulting Group (BCG) ?
Between XDNA - A Downer Company and Boston Consulting Group (BCG), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between XDNA - A Downer Company and Boston Consulting Group (BCG), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2