Comparison Overview

Xcel Energy

VS

Xunta de Galicia

Xcel Energy

401 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, Minnesota, undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 800 and 849

As a leading electric and natural gas energy company, we offer a comprehensive portfolio of energy-related products and services to 3.4 million electricity customers and 1.9 million natural gas customers across our eight states: Colorado, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Texas and Wisconsin. Our workforce of more than 12,000 is rising to the challenge of a dynamic, constantly-changing utility industry. One that requires us to be even more customer focused, forward thinking and productive while remaining committed to meeting our customers’ fundamental need for safe, reliable, affordable energy. Do you have a passion for renewable energy, like wind or solar? Or care about giving back to the community? You’ll be in a position to directly impact our energy future. At Xcel Energy, you’ll be challenged, respected and rewarded. You’ll find an ethical team committed to excellence, safety and environmental stewardship. A dynamic company where you’ll have meaningful work that makes a difference.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 11,164
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Xunta de Galicia

San Caetano, s/n, Santiago de Compostela, 15781, ES
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

A Xunta aparece definida no Estatuto de Autonomía, aprobado en 1981, como órgano colexiado do Goberno de Galicia. Na actualidade, a Xunta está composta polo presidente e dez conselleiros. A comunidade exerce as súas funcións administrativas a través da Xunta e dos seus entes e órganos dependentes. Correspóndelle á Xunta aprobar os regulamentos xerais dos seus propios tributos e elaborar as normas regulamentarias precisas para xestionar os impostos estatais cedidos de acordo cos termos desta cesión e a elaboración e aplicación do orzamento da Comunidade Autónoma de Galicia, que deben ser examinados polo Parlamento. A Xunta tamén se encarga de coordinar a actividade das Deputacións Provinciais do seu territorio naquelo que afecte dun xeito directo ao interese xeral de Galicia, e para iso unirá os orzamentos que elas elaboren de seu. Así mesmo, poderá encomendar a execución dos seus acordos ás devanditas deputacións, que serán as encargadas de levar a cabo as funcións transferidas polo Executivo autonómico.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 10,790
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xcel-energy.jpeg
Xcel Energy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xunta-de-galicia.jpeg
Xunta de Galicia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Xcel Energy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Xunta de Galicia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Xcel Energy in 2026.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Xunta de Galicia in 2026.

Incident History — Xcel Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Xcel Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Xunta de Galicia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Xunta de Galicia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xcel-energy.jpeg
Xcel Energy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xunta-de-galicia.jpeg
Xunta de Galicia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Xcel Energy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Xunta de Galicia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Xunta de Galicia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Xcel Energy company.

In the current year, Xunta de Galicia company and Xcel Energy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Xunta de Galicia company nor Xcel Energy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Xunta de Galicia company nor Xcel Energy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Xunta de Galicia company nor Xcel Energy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Xcel Energy company nor Xunta de Galicia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Xcel Energy nor Xunta de Galicia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Xcel Energy company nor Xunta de Galicia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Xcel Energy company employs more people globally than Xunta de Galicia company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Xcel Energy nor Xunta de Galicia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Xcel Energy nor Xunta de Galicia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Xcel Energy nor Xunta de Galicia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Xcel Energy nor Xunta de Galicia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Xcel Energy nor Xunta de Galicia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Xcel Energy nor Xunta de Galicia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N