Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

X-BIONIC®X-BIONIC®
VS
New BalanceNew Balance
X-BIONIC®

X-BIONIC®

Flurstrasse 55, Zurich, 8048, CH

Last Update: 02/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.x-bionic.com
758/1000Fair

Welcome to X-BIONIC®, where innovation meets performance. 🤝 Inspired by nature and led by technology, we're dedicated to engineering the most advanced sportswear for athletes and sports enthusiasts around the world. Our patented technology optimizes your body's pote...

NAICS:33992
NAICS Definition:Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing
Employees:72
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
New Balance

New Balance

100 Guest St, Brighton Landing, Brighton, MA, US, 02135-2088

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.newbalance.com
795/1000Fair

In 1906, New Balance began as a humble one-man operation founded on the belief that “we were born to move,” and has since grown into an international corporation, selling footwear and apparel in over 120 countries and employing over 14,000 associates worldwide. Our miss...

NAICS:33992
NAICS Definition:Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing
Employees:10,912
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
X-BIONIC®

X-BIONIC®

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
New Balance

New Balance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for X-BIONIC® in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New Balance in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - X-BIONIC® (X = Date, Y = Severity)

X-BIONIC® cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - New Balance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New Balance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
X-BIONIC®

X-BIONIC®

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
New Balance

New Balance

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between X-BIONIC® company and New Balance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between X-BIONIC® company and New Balance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between X-BIONIC® company and New Balance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between X-BIONIC® company and New Balance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between X-BIONIC® company and New Balance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between X-BIONIC® company and New Balance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between X-BIONIC® company and New Balance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between X-BIONIC® company and New Balance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between X-BIONIC® company and New Balance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between X-BIONIC® company and New Balance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between X-BIONIC® company and New Balance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between X-BIONIC® and New Balance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between X-BIONIC® and New Balance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - X-BIONIC® or New Balance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - X-BIONIC® or New Balance ?
Between X-BIONIC® and New Balance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between X-BIONIC® and New Balance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3