Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia PacificWyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific
VS
HyattHyatt
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific

88 Market Street, Singapore, 048948, SG

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.wyndhamhotels.com
772/1000Fair

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts (NYSE: WH) is the world’s largest hotel franchising company by the number of franchised properties, with approximately 8,300 hotels across approximately 100 countries on six continents. Through its network of over 855,000 rooms appealing to the ...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:68
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hyatt

Hyatt

150 N Riverside Plaza, Chicago, IL, US, 60606

Last Update: 18/07/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.hyatt.com
583/1000Very Poor

Hyatt is guided by its purpose: to care for people so they can be their best. Hyatt’s portfolio includes 1,000+ hotel and all-inclusive properties in over 75 countries across 6 continents. Hyatt’s offerings include brands in the Timeless Collection, including Park Hyatt...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:89,774
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hyatt

Hyatt

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hyatt in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hyatt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hyatt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hyatt

Hyatt

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FOHNORHYAOMN1769001286
🔒 Incident : Breach
NORKFCFOHTACHYA1769001351
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
HYA1768842036

FAQ

Between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific company and Hyatt company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific company and Hyatt company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific company and Hyatt company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific company and Hyatt company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific company and Hyatt company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific company and Hyatt company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific company and Hyatt company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific company and Hyatt company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific company and Hyatt company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific company and Hyatt company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific company and Hyatt company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific and Hyatt, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific and Hyatt, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific or Hyatt ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific or Hyatt ?
Between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific and Hyatt, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Asia Pacific and Hyatt, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1